2016
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/830/2/l36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cygnus X-3: Its Little Friend’s Counterpart, the Distance to Cygnus X-3, and Outflows/Jets

Abstract: Chandra observations have revealed a feature within 16″ of Cygnus X-3 that varied in phase with Cygnus X-3. This feature was shown to be a Bok globule that is along the line of sight to Cygnus X-3. We report on observations made with the Submillimeter Array to search for molecular emission from this globule, also known as Cygnus X-3ʼs "Little Friend." We have found a counterpart in both 12 CO (2-1) and 13 CO (2-1) emission. From the velocity shift of the molecular lines we are able to find two probable dista… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) The following distance estimates have been used: GRS 1915+105: 8.6 +2.0 −1.6 kpc (Reid et al 2014), Cyg X-3: 7. The interstellar absorption for Cyg X-3 is relatively high as a result of its location in the plane of the Galaxy, and likely because it is located behind two spiral arms and the Cygnus X star-forming region (McCollough et al 2016). We fixed the lower limit of the hydrogen column to 3.5 × 10 22 atoms cm −2 , which is approximately the value found in studies where instruments with softer X-ray response were used (Koljonen et al 2018;Kallman et al 2019).…”
Section: Cyg X-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(b) The following distance estimates have been used: GRS 1915+105: 8.6 +2.0 −1.6 kpc (Reid et al 2014), Cyg X-3: 7. The interstellar absorption for Cyg X-3 is relatively high as a result of its location in the plane of the Galaxy, and likely because it is located behind two spiral arms and the Cygnus X star-forming region (McCollough et al 2016). We fixed the lower limit of the hydrogen column to 3.5 × 10 22 atoms cm −2 , which is approximately the value found in studies where instruments with softer X-ray response were used (Koljonen et al 2018;Kallman et al 2019).…”
Section: Cyg X-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dash marks components that are not part of the spectral model in a particular data set. (a) The following distance estimates have been used: GRS 1915+105: 8.6 +2.0 −1.6 kpc (Reid et al 2014), Cyg X-3: 7.4 ± 1.1 kpc (McCollough et al 2016), V4641 Sgr: 6.2 ± 0.7 kpc (MacDonald et al 2014). (b) The following mass estimates have been used: GRS 1915+105: 12.…”
Section: Cyg X-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a persistent, bright source at radio and X-ray wavelengths, featuring radio flux density levels around 100 mJy (e.g., Waltman et al 1994) and 2−8 × 10 −8 erg cm −2 s −1 bolometric Xray flux (e.g., Hjalmarsdotter et al 2008) ∼50% of the time. For a distance estimate of 7.4 kpc (McCollough et al 2016) these correspond to luminosities 10 31 -10 32 erg s −1 and 1-5 × 10 38 erg s −1 , respectively; for the second best distance solution of 10.2 kpc the luminosities are a factor of two higher (see McCollough et al 2016 for details on the distance estimation). Occasionally, Cyg X-3 undergoes giant radio outbursts, during which the radio flux density levels can reach 20 Jy (Waltman et al 1996) making Cyg X-3 the brightest Galactic radio source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this system the compact object is extremely close to its Wolf-Rayet companion (van Kerkwijk et al 1992;Koljonen & Maccarone 2017) rendering the system peculiar in many ways when compared to other XRBs with low companion mass, such as for example GX 339-4 or even the high-mass system Cyg X-1. It is situated at a distance of 7.4 ± 1.1 kpc (McCollough et al 2016) with an orbital period of 4.8 h (Parsignault et al 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%