2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cylinder test: Development of a new microbond method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra were recorded from 4000 to 500 cm -1 at a resolution of 8 cm -1 , averaged from 128 scans. Characteristic bands of non-cellulosic materials were taken into consideration: 1730 cm -1 ketone/aldehyde C=O stretch for both hemicelluloses and pectins (Xu et al 2013;Espinal-Ruiz et al 2016), 1100 and 1017 cm -1 bands as the strongest peaks of pectic polysaccharides (Kačuráková et al 2000), and 1507 and 1436 cm -1 C=C stretch for the aromatic rings of lignin (Sun et al 2000;Alemdar and Sain 2008) were evaluated. Peak intensities were related to the band at around 2900 cm -1 (C-H stretching) used as internal standard since it practically does not change during various treatments (Łojewska et al 2005).…”
Section: Removal Of Non-cellulosic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra were recorded from 4000 to 500 cm -1 at a resolution of 8 cm -1 , averaged from 128 scans. Characteristic bands of non-cellulosic materials were taken into consideration: 1730 cm -1 ketone/aldehyde C=O stretch for both hemicelluloses and pectins (Xu et al 2013;Espinal-Ruiz et al 2016), 1100 and 1017 cm -1 bands as the strongest peaks of pectic polysaccharides (Kačuráková et al 2000), and 1507 and 1436 cm -1 C=C stretch for the aromatic rings of lignin (Sun et al 2000;Alemdar and Sain 2008) were evaluated. Peak intensities were related to the band at around 2900 cm -1 (C-H stretching) used as internal standard since it practically does not change during various treatments (Łojewska et al 2005).…”
Section: Removal Of Non-cellulosic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential difference between these two tests lies in their specimen scale and geometry. Some more recent development in micromechanical testing for IFSS focused on altering the sample geometry in MBT to reduce the data scatter [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an earlier article [12] we had reported that the interfacial shear strength depends strongly on the test conditions. Therefore the major goal of this paper this was to get a deeper understanding for probable reasons of the strength variations caused by the effects of variations in the cylinder geometry (embedded fiber length (L), and the cylinder diameter (D), see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cylinder test, developed by us (see Fig. 1), can be considered as a variant of the microdroplet test [12], that eliminates basic disadvantages of the original method and diminishes some related disturbing effects related to test configuration. Thus, errors due to uncertainties of droplet shape and size, major stress variations arising around the supporting points of the fixing blades and concomitant deformations [13,15,19] could be eliminated with specific cylinder geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%