2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cylindrical milling tools: Comparative real case study for process stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there exist more complex models for the chip thickness calculation, such as the trochoidal tooth path model, which results in time-dependent delays (Faassen et al, 2007) and models including the vibrations of the tool-workpiece system that results in state-dependent delays in the model equations (Insperger et al, 2007;Bachrathy et al, 2011). In addition, general tool geometry can also be modeled such as ball end milling (Ozturk and Budak, 2010) or tools with varying pitch and with varying helix angles, which result in multiple and distributed delays (Sellmeier and Denkena, 2011;Stepan et al, 2014). An intriguing combination of point delay and time varying delay shows up in case of digital control of machining processes (Lehotzky and Insperger, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there exist more complex models for the chip thickness calculation, such as the trochoidal tooth path model, which results in time-dependent delays (Faassen et al, 2007) and models including the vibrations of the tool-workpiece system that results in state-dependent delays in the model equations (Insperger et al, 2007;Bachrathy et al, 2011). In addition, general tool geometry can also be modeled such as ball end milling (Ozturk and Budak, 2010) or tools with varying pitch and with varying helix angles, which result in multiple and distributed delays (Sellmeier and Denkena, 2011;Stepan et al, 2014). An intriguing combination of point delay and time varying delay shows up in case of digital control of machining processes (Lehotzky and Insperger, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the wide spectrum of the available efficient numerical techniques, the predicted stability lobe diagrams often do not match experimental cutting tests [29]. One reason for this can be identified in the limitations of models of machine tool chatter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Typically, five to ten measurements are performed and their average is used for the stability calculation [29].…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time delay also plays an important role in contact problems such as the "shimmy motion" of wheels [8]. Machine tool vibrations are also explained by the so-called regenerative delay (for details, see Chapter 4.4 in [9] or [10,11]). In the above examples, time delay typically has a destabilizing effect, which is manifested as unwanted vibrations or oscillations around the desired steady-state motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%