2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00794-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cylindrical tube optimization using response surface method based on stochastic process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain an optimum state for three tubes absorbers, response surface method (RSM) [25] was used which is one of the common methods in optimizing the collapse of the energy absorber and has been used in a lot of research, including references [19][20][21][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In all of the above mentioned references the response surface method has predicted acceptable results with small errors.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to obtain an optimum state for three tubes absorbers, response surface method (RSM) [25] was used which is one of the common methods in optimizing the collapse of the energy absorber and has been used in a lot of research, including references [19][20][21][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In all of the above mentioned references the response surface method has predicted acceptable results with small errors.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a multi-objective optimization problem is proposed. On energy absorbers, several methods have been used to optimize the process of collapse [26]. The method selected in this study to optimize the process of collapse in the multi-tube absorbers is on the basis of the project presented first by Derringer and Suich [36].…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity in shape parameterisation is in most of these studies limited; often the height or width of the total cross-section is used, which makes the optimisation closer to a size or scale optimisation than to a real shape optimisation where more freedom is given to the cross-sectional shape, e.g. [21,22].…”
Section: Cross-section Optimisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Kriging surrogate model is an interpolate technology. This model has been applied early to solve the complex engineering problems such as those in aeronautics and astronautics (Simpson et al, 1998) and mechanics (Lee et al, 2002). Recently, Huang et al (2006) have used Kriging model to reduce die wear for metalforming process.…”
Section: Kriging Surrogate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%