2015
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2015-06171-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cylindrically bounded constant mean curvature surfaces in $\mathbb {H} ^2\times \mathbb {R}$

Abstract: In this paper it is proved that a properly embedded constant mean curvature surface in H 2 × R which has finite topology and stays at a finite distance from a vertical geodesic line is invariant by rotation around a vertical geodesic line.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of this result is similar to the one of the gradient estimate proved by Spruck [25, Theorem 1.1] and Mazet [13,Proposition 16]. Before beginning the proof, let us make some preliminary computation.…”
Section: Gradient Estimatementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The proof of this result is similar to the one of the gradient estimate proved by Spruck [25, Theorem 1.1] and Mazet [13,Proposition 16]. Before beginning the proof, let us make some preliminary computation.…”
Section: Gradient Estimatementioning
confidence: 52%
“…This number is usually called the CMC flux of M along [α] associated to K. Observe that the mean curvature of M is computed with respect to the unit normal vector that, along α, points to the same closed component of M ∪ β as N , and that N, η ≤ 0 along α. The above argument shows the homological invariance of the CMC flux; we refer the reader to the papers [13,17,18,21] for applications of this CMC flux.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 75%
“…For a vertical axis γ the periodicity implies that Σ is contained in a vertical cylinder. Mazet has shown in [Maz15] that such surfaces in H 2 × R are rotationally invariant.…”
Section: Sketch Of Proof (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%