2014 IEEE International Systems Conference Proceedings 2014
DOI: 10.1109/syscon.2014.6819227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CyMRisk: An approach for computing mission risk due to cyber attacks

Abstract: This paper provides an overview of CyMRisk, an experimental architecture for computing mission risk due to cyber attack. In its current form, the approach employs a simulation of key aspects of a target business/mission process as well as attacker behavior to estimate mission impact due to cyber attacks. In addition, CyMRisk estimates worst case attacker level of effort associated with carrying out such attacks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A metric of performance for a system with N 0 cyber components. In general, the metric of performance will be specific to the purpose of the particular cyber system and any physical system that it enables [6,[26][27][28], but it is also possible to consider a generic metric of performance determined by the state of the cyber system [6].…”
Section: Systems With Only Two Possible Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metric of performance for a system with N 0 cyber components. In general, the metric of performance will be specific to the purpose of the particular cyber system and any physical system that it enables [6,[26][27][28], but it is also possible to consider a generic metric of performance determined by the state of the cyber system [6].…”
Section: Systems With Only Two Possible Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BluGen does not prescribe how raw criticality scores are derived; the scores could be assigned by SMEs or they could come about from running a mission performance model that can model cyber effects and automatically determine related mission impacts, e.g., [34]. The former would typically provide scores along an ordinal scale, while the latter would typically provide scores along a ratio scale based on mission performance metrics.…”
Section: Environment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, such assessments are time consuming and subject to the effects of SME-bias in assigning scores along ordinal scales. While some progress has been made in automating impact scoring, e.g., [33] and [34], approaches to automating attack likelihood scoring remain in their infancy. Furthermore, there is thus far no clear-cut automation path that leads from attackcentric risk assessment to mitigation analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While progress is being made on augmenting or replacing SMEs for scoring cyber attack impact on mission/business in mission-cyber risk assessments [6] [7], the community is not as far along in scoring likelihood, and, in particular, the LOE component of likelihood. The rest of this paper focuses on the LOE component.…”
Section: Figure 1 -Sample Mission-cyber Risk Assessment Plotmentioning
confidence: 99%