2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cystatin C could be a replacement to serum creatinine for diagnosing and monitoring kidney function in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pediatric population, CysC has been postulated to have an advantage over creatinine because the low muscle mass in children leads to very low creatinine levels [35,36]. Moreover, unlike creatinine, serum CysC reflects renal function in children independent of age, gender, height, and body composition [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pediatric population, CysC has been postulated to have an advantage over creatinine because the low muscle mass in children leads to very low creatinine levels [35,36]. Moreover, unlike creatinine, serum CysC reflects renal function in children independent of age, gender, height, and body composition [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With using a GFR of 70 mL/min as a cutoff value, serum cystatin-C had sensitivity 100%, specificity 48% and AUROC 0.94, and serum creatinine had a sensitivity 77%, specificity 91% and AUROC 0.81 and they concluded that cystatin-C is a very interesting option, and could be a replacement to serum creatinine for diagnosing and possibly monitoring kidney function in children. 21 Ali and Mahmoud found that AUROC for serum cystatin-C was significantly higher than that for serum creatinine (92% versus 80%). Moreover, serum cystatin-C had higher sensitivity and specificity than serum creatinine (66% versus 26%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast to Cr, CysC is not affected by age, diet, or exercise, and since its concentration in the blood is dependent on the glomerular filtration rate, it has been reported to be a useful diagnostic biomarker in patients with AKI [18][19][20] except children, in whom the utility of CysC was limited and not considered to surpass that of Cr [21,22]. Recent studies, however, have shown that S-CysC is more useful biomarker for renal function than S-Cr even in children including neonates [23][24][25]. Furthermore, unlike Cr, CysC does not cross the placenta; therefore, the CysC levels may reflect renal function of the neonates even at the first day of life [26,27] though only few studies have examined S-CysC levels in this period [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%