1961
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1961.63040080016020a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cystic Duct Reduplication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can only be established with certainty by demonstrating the valves of Heister in the aberrant duct. There have been four reports of a double cystic duct as in Case 2 (Chilimoniuk 1976, Perelman 1961, Flint 1922, Paul 1947, but this anomaly was not encountered in the 1200 dissections reviewed by Kune & Sali (1980). Our two patients may both have the same anomaly, since the upper extent of the aberrant duct was not fully explored in Case 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can only be established with certainty by demonstrating the valves of Heister in the aberrant duct. There have been four reports of a double cystic duct as in Case 2 (Chilimoniuk 1976, Perelman 1961, Flint 1922, Paul 1947, but this anomaly was not encountered in the 1200 dissections reviewed by Kune & Sali (1980). Our two patients may both have the same anomaly, since the upper extent of the aberrant duct was not fully explored in Case 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Double cystic duct is an extremely rare anomaly. 2 Usually, a double cystic duct is associated with a double gallbladder. 3 Double cystic duct draining a single gallbladder has been documented in isolated case reports in the English 4-8 and European 9-13 literature, accounting for fewer than 20% published cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single gallbladder with double cystic duct is an extremely rare biliary tract system anomaly; there were no reported cases in a study of the intraoperative cholangiograms of 3845 cases [1], [2]. If this anomaly diagnosed during or after surgery, rather than before surgery, it might lead to bile duct injury or bile leakage [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%