1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02486.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytochrome and alternative pathway respiration in white spruce (Picea glauca) roots. Effects of growth and measurement temperature

Abstract: Interactions between growth temperature and measurement temperature were examined for their effects on white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] root respiration. Total dark respiration rates increased with measurement temperature and were unaffected by growth temperature. Partitioning of respiratory electron flow between the cytochrome and alternative pathways was also unaffected by growth temperature. The proportion of respiration mediated by the alternative pathway was constant at measurement temperatures b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability in the degree of thermal acclimation of root R is common (Atkin et al, 2005). For example, both Burton et al (2002) and Weger & Guy (1991) found no evidence of acclimation in roots of woody species, whereas acclimation of root R has been observed in saplings or young trees grown at constant elevated temperatures (Bryla et al, 1997;Tjoelker et al, 1999) or at elevated field temperatures (Bryla et al, 2001). Similarly, the degree of acclimation of root R was highly variable amongst 16 species in the study by Loveys et al (2003).…”
Section: The Dependence Of Thermal Acclimation Of Root R On N Availabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in the degree of thermal acclimation of root R is common (Atkin et al, 2005). For example, both Burton et al (2002) and Weger & Guy (1991) found no evidence of acclimation in roots of woody species, whereas acclimation of root R has been observed in saplings or young trees grown at constant elevated temperatures (Bryla et al, 1997;Tjoelker et al, 1999) or at elevated field temperatures (Bryla et al, 2001). Similarly, the degree of acclimation of root R was highly variable amongst 16 species in the study by Loveys et al (2003).…”
Section: The Dependence Of Thermal Acclimation Of Root R On N Availabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root respiration increases as a function of temperature, with the degree of increase being dependent on the temperature coefficient of respiration. Acclimation of root respiration to temperature occurs in Plantago lanceolata (Smakman and Hofstra, 1982) and Zostera marina (Zimmerman et al, 1989), but not in Helianthus annuus (Szaniawski and Kielkiewicz, 1982), Picea glauca (Weger and Guy, 1991), Picea engelmannii and Abies lasiocarpa (Sowell and Spomer, 1986). Acclimation of respiration to the growth temperature results in homeostasis of respiration, such that warm-acclimated and cold-acclimated plants display similar rates of respiration when measured at their respective growth temperatures (K6rner and Larcher, 1988).…”
Section: Interaction Between High [C02] and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Goodine et al (2008), 2 This study (Supporting Information Table S1), 3 Stinziano Hüner and Way (2015), 4 Stinziano and Way (2017) Warren et al (2003), 10 Jach and Ceulemans (2000), 11 Kellomaki and Wang (1996), 12 Medlyn et al (2005), 13 Marek et al (2002), 14 Long Postl and Bolhar-Nordenkampf (1993), 15 Wallin et al (1992), 16 Medlyn et al (2002), 17 Ibrom et al (2006), 18 Lusk and Reich (2000), 19 Tarvainen et al (2013), 20 Busch Hüner and Ensminger (2007), 21 Ayub, Smith, Tissue, and Atkin (2011), 22 Atkin and Tjoelker (2003), 23 Lavigne Little and Riding (2004), 24 Mean of other parameters, 25 Acosta, Pavelka, Pokorny, Janous, and Marek (2008), 26 Zha et al (2004), 27 Tjoelker Oleksyn and Reich (1999), 28 Koch et al (2007), 29 Weger and Guy (1991), 30 Crookshanks Taylor and Broadmeadow (199...…”
Section: How Does Variation In Parameter Values and Metabolic Acclimentioning
confidence: 99%