1988
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.18.6647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans: both hemes are located in subunit I.

Abstract: The two-subunit cytochrome c oxidase fromParacoccus denitrificans has been sequentially digested with chymotrypsin and Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease. The smaller subunit of the enzyme (apparent Mr 32,000) was split into numerous peptides that were removed by anion-exchange HPLC. The larger subunit was only digested to a limited extent (from an apparent Mr 45,000 to M, 43,000), and the spectral properties were preserved relative to the native enzyme (a reduced minus oxidized difference spectrum with maxima … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of these studies indicate that the high-affinity binding site is located in subunit II, with some of the nuclear subunits constituting part of the interaction domain (Bisson & Montecucco, 1982;Kadenbach & Stroh, 1984). In contrast, the results of Muller et al (1988) suggest that the Km for cytochrome c is unaltered after proteolytic digestion of subunit II in Paracoccus denitrificans cytochrome oxidase. The location and significance of the low-affinity site have yet to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Results of these studies indicate that the high-affinity binding site is located in subunit II, with some of the nuclear subunits constituting part of the interaction domain (Bisson & Montecucco, 1982;Kadenbach & Stroh, 1984). In contrast, the results of Muller et al (1988) suggest that the Km for cytochrome c is unaltered after proteolytic digestion of subunit II in Paracoccus denitrificans cytochrome oxidase. The location and significance of the low-affinity site have yet to be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Spectroscopically, cytochrome a and CuA interact only weakly and are often treated as independent electron acceptors. On the basis of spectroscopic evidence as well as sequence homology data, it is now generally agreed that these redox-active metal centers are located in subunits I and II (Mueller et al, 1988). Specifically, it has been suggested that cytochrome a, cytochrome a3, and CuB reside in subunit I while CuA is associated with subunit II [for a model, see Holm et al (1987)].…”
Section: Structural Biochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heme−copper oxidases are members of a superfamily of proton-pumping metalloenzymes found in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, which couple the energy released from the 4e - reduction of dioxygen to water to the formation of a proton motive force across the membrane which can be used for the synthesis of ATP. , The most-widely studied is the class of oxidases found in mammalian mitochondria, yeasts, and a number of bacterial systems such as Thermus thermophilus, Rhodobacter spheroides, , and Paracoccus denitrificans. This branch of the superfamily utilizes cytochrome c as the electron-donating substrate and contains three redox centers: Cu A (thiolate-bridged binuclear mixed-valence center), heme a (6-coordinate low spin), and the dioxygen-binding heme a 3 −Cu B (magnetically coupled, S = 2 binuclear center). A second major branch of the family, exemplified by the cytochrome bo 3 and aa 3 -600 oxidases of Escherichia coli 1,2,9 and Bacillus subtilis , , respectively, uses ubiquinol as its reducing substrate, and in these cases, the Cu A -binding site is absent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%