2018
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytocompatibility of Direct Laser Interference-patterned Titanium Surfaces for Implants

Abstract: Abstract. In an effort to generate titanium surfaces forimplants with improved osseointegration, we used direct laser interference patterning (DLIP) Improving the osseointegration of implants is a key issue in dental implantation and surface modification is a major strategy for enhancing the attachment, proliferation and differentiation of cells in contact with such implants.For titanium implants, various methods are used to modify the surface roughness, including sandblasting, acid-etching, anodization, cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the generated structures and phase compositions can have an impact on fatigue strength [27], whereby residual stress of the material can be reduced and fatigue strength can be increased by laser shock peening [28]. The in vitro cytocompatibility of all surfaces was supported in accordance with the ISO 10993-5 standard on the basis of WST-1, which is similar to the findings of Hartjen et al [29]. The vital osteoblast reaction in adhering and spreading across the surface, and especially the affinity to grow into the pores as well as partially cover them, is a further indication of a cytocompatible surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, the generated structures and phase compositions can have an impact on fatigue strength [27], whereby residual stress of the material can be reduced and fatigue strength can be increased by laser shock peening [28]. The in vitro cytocompatibility of all surfaces was supported in accordance with the ISO 10993-5 standard on the basis of WST-1, which is similar to the findings of Hartjen et al [29]. The vital osteoblast reaction in adhering and spreading across the surface, and especially the affinity to grow into the pores as well as partially cover them, is a further indication of a cytocompatible surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Many surface treatment methods currently exist, including chemical methods [ 68 ] and physical methods [ 69 ]. Physical methods consist of milling [ 70 ], laser [ [71] , [72] , [73] ], sandblasting [ 74 , 75 ], and electrical discharge machining (EDM) [ 76 , 77 ], while chemical methods include acid [ 78 ] and alkali treatment [ 79 , 80 ], nitriding [ 81 , 82 ], and plasma treatment [ 83 , 84 ]. In addition, some electrochemical methods are available, such as electropolishing [ 85 , 86 ], electrolytic polishing [ 87 , 88 ], anodic oxidation [ 89 , 90 ], and micro-arc oxidation (MAO, also known as plasma electrolytic oxidation) [ 80 , 91 ].…”
Section: Methods To Improve the Biocompatibility Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%