1986
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic affinity between the new species Glycine argyrea and its congeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this type of rooting is not preferred, particularly given the suspect status ofa molecular clock for this data set, it does join the annual species to the group ofperennials whose species have been used most successfully in intersubgeneric crosses (Broue et aI., 1982;Newell and Hymowitz, 1982;Singh and Hymowitz, 1985a;Grant et al, 1986). Chloroplast-DNA studies on the group ofgenera putatively related to Glycine (Phaseoleae subtribe Glycininae; Lackey, 1981) should provide definitive rooting of this tree and currently are in progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this type of rooting is not preferred, particularly given the suspect status ofa molecular clock for this data set, it does join the annual species to the group ofperennials whose species have been used most successfully in intersubgeneric crosses (Broue et aI., 1982;Newell and Hymowitz, 1982;Singh and Hymowitz, 1985a;Grant et al, 1986). Chloroplast-DNA studies on the group ofgenera putatively related to Glycine (Phaseoleae subtribe Glycininae; Lackey, 1981) should provide definitive rooting of this tree and currently are in progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal source of information concerning relationships among these species has been the analysis of meiotic pairing in artificially produced inter-and intraspecific hybrids (Putievsky and Broue, 1979;Newell and Hymowitz, 1983;Grant et al, 1984bGrant et al, , 1986Hymowitz, 1985b, 1985c;Singh et al, 1988), which has documented the existence ofa number ofgenome groups in the subgenus. While genome analysis has been able to identify groups of related species, analysis of experimentally produced hybrids is incapable of resolving relationships among taxa whose genomes show little or no affinity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. canescens does not contribute directly to any natural allopolyploids. The synthetic allopolyploids (2n = 78) were grown from seed produced from selfed plants that were created by doubling sterile F1 hybrids using colchicine, as described by Grant et al [1986]. Many years later, when chloroplast DNA variation in the group was examined, it was determined that the direction of the synthetic crosses is opposite that of natural T5 species.…”
Section: G Clandestina (G1253)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth genus, Gossypium, was excluded because of the difficulty of estimating genetic distances among multiple polyploid and reticulate species within this genus, and the many unresolved systematic relationships among taxa in this group (Seelanan et al 1997(Seelanan et al , 1999. Allopatric and sympatric species pairs were determined using species ranges obtained from the literature or floras (Glycine: Brown et al 1985;Grant et al 1986;Harden 1990. Silene: Hitchcock and Maguire 1947;Prentice 1976;Ghazanfar 1981.…”
Section: Sources Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%