1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02257268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of the satellite DNA of the genusCtenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae) from Uruguay

Abstract: The genus of subterranean rodents Ctenomys presents the widest range of variability in diploid number among mammals (from 2n = 10 to 2n = 70). In Uruguay, this variability is observed in karyotypes with 2n = 44, 50 or 58 and two geographically isolated populations with 70 chromosomes but different karyotypic structure. The last three populations were analyzed in the present study. They present a satellite DNA, which was isolated from genomic DNA after AluI digestion. In situ hybridization showed that this sate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we must take into account the combined action of chance events and selection, since the population structure of Ctenomys shows a wide variability, from small deme subdivision to colonies (Villar et al 2005). Nevertheless, one of the striking facts in Ctenomys karyotypic evolution is the conservation of DNA content (Ruedas et al 1992;Novello et al 1996), in spite of the variation in chromosome number. The stability of DNA content could reflect the maintenance of the same genome in different chromosomes, in order to maintain linkage groups, since Robertsonian rearrangements are the main changes observed in Ctenomys evolution (Villar et al 2005).…”
Section: Geographic Barriersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we must take into account the combined action of chance events and selection, since the population structure of Ctenomys shows a wide variability, from small deme subdivision to colonies (Villar et al 2005). Nevertheless, one of the striking facts in Ctenomys karyotypic evolution is the conservation of DNA content (Ruedas et al 1992;Novello et al 1996), in spite of the variation in chromosome number. The stability of DNA content could reflect the maintenance of the same genome in different chromosomes, in order to maintain linkage groups, since Robertsonian rearrangements are the main changes observed in Ctenomys evolution (Villar et al 2005).…”
Section: Geographic Barriersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Population structure characteristics are frequently invoked to explain the origin of chromosome rearrangements in subterranean rodents, through the action of genetic drift (Nevo et al 1994;Novello et al 1996). However, no direct evidence of such events has been presented (but see Nevo et al 1997).…”
Section: Geographic Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal differentiation in this genus also includes a high degree of variation in the amount and localization of heterochromatin, ranging from positive C-bands in the centromeric area of few chromosomes, to karyotypes showing heterochromatic short arms in the whole chromosomes (Rossi et al 1995;Novello et al 1996). These patterns were confirmed in Uruguayan populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The major satellite DNA of tuco-tucos, named RPCS (repetitive PuvII Ctenomys sequence), is organized in long arrays of 348 bp monomer units (Novello et al 1988;Rossi et al 1990). In situ hybridization showed that RPCS mainly localizes in different chromosomal regions positive for C-banding: whole arms and pericentromeric blocks, as well as telomeric and interstitial bands (Rossi et al 1993;Novello et al 1996) in mitotic and meiotic cells (Novello and Villar 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, these animals prefer living along the banks or near the mouths of rivers (Altuna, 1983;Lessa and Langguth, 1983;Altuna et al, 1999). Moreover, this species is characterized by having the highest levels of karyotypic variation at intra-and inter-population levels (Reig et al, 1990;Novello et al, 1990Novello et al, , 1996Villar et al, 2005) that is incongruent with the low levels of morphological and molecular variation observed among populations (D'Anatro and D'Elía, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%