1997
DOI: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Monitoring of Pesticide Sprayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon could explain the higher level of CAs compared with results reported by other investigators such as Joksic et al (1977). On the other hand, Joksic et al (1997) reported 0.13% CAs in the exposed group. However, they took only dicentric and ring chromosomes into account, which were not findings reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon could explain the higher level of CAs compared with results reported by other investigators such as Joksic et al (1977). On the other hand, Joksic et al (1997) reported 0.13% CAs in the exposed group. However, they took only dicentric and ring chromosomes into account, which were not findings reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Cytogenetic damage related to pesticide exposure has been reported in various populations. Some investigators have reported significant differences in the percentage of CAs in exposed individuals (range, 2.66-10.30%) compared with control (range, 0.53-5.52%) (Balaji and Sasikala 1993;Brega et al 1998;De Ferrari et al 1991;Joksic et al 1997; Kourakis et al 1992;Rupa and Reddi 1991;Yoder et al 1973); others have not (de Cassia Stocco et al 1982;Hoyos et al 1996;Steenland et al 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El grupo control del pueblo aledaño al viñedo tenía aumentada la frecuencia de micronúcleos en células binucleadas de linfocitos. Los investigadores concluyen que dicho aumento se debe a la contaminación, principalmente por aire, que producen los plaguicidas que se aplican en el área (Joksic et al 1996).…”
Section: Cuadro 2 Resultados Del Análisis De Regresión Múltiple De Caunclassified
“…Several studies on the chromosomal effect of pesticides have been made using CA; the positive results obtained showed a correlation with the exposure time (Dulout et al, 1985;Paldy et al, 1987;Rupa et al, 1989a;Carbonell et al, 1993;Joksić et al, 1997;Kaioumova & Khabutdinova, 1998;Cuenca & Ramírez, 2004;Zeljezic et al, 2009). Other positive results did not find correlation between the exposure time and the CA induction (Rita et al, 1987;Rupa et al, 1988, 1989b, 1991a, El-Ghazali et al, 1990Kourakis et al, 1992;Scarpato et al, 1996;Amr, 1999;Au, 1999;Antonucci & de Syllos Colus, 2000;Lander et al, 2000;Paz-yMiño et al, 2002;Sailaja et al, 2006); meanwhile others authors although also found positive frequency of CA but did not determined this correlation (Nehéz et al, 1988;Jabloniká et al, 1989;De Ferrari et al, 1991;Carbonell et al, 1995;Mohammad et al, 1995;Kourakis et al, 1996;Lander et al, 2000;Garaj-Vrhovac & Zeljezic, 2001, 2002Ascarrunz et al, 2006;Ergene et al, 2007;Mañas et al, 2009).…”
Section: Chromosomal Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%