2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic testing of pregnancy loss tissue: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Chromosomal abnormalities are identified in almost half of pregnancy losses. The percentage of detected abnormalities is comparable in women that have suffered from sporadic or recurrent pregnancy loss. Routine testing of pregnancy loss tissue for chromosomal abnormalities has no clinical benefit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these are similar values to those previously published in prior studies using more conventional culture‐based karyotyping methods. 2 Additionally, the frequency of each chromosomal abnormality in our current sample series was also similar to that reported in these studies. Trisomy 16, 22, and 15 have been the most frequently observed of the autosomal aneuploidies in POC, 4 , 9 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 whereas trisomies 13, 18, and 21 are the commonly found neonatal chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, these are similar values to those previously published in prior studies using more conventional culture‐based karyotyping methods. 2 Additionally, the frequency of each chromosomal abnormality in our current sample series was also similar to that reported in these studies. Trisomy 16, 22, and 15 have been the most frequently observed of the autosomal aneuploidies in POC, 4 , 9 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 whereas trisomies 13, 18, and 21 are the commonly found neonatal chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“… 1 Many factors are known to cause miscarriages, but more than 50% are due to chromosomal abnormalities. 2 Chromosome testing of a product of conception (POC) reveals not only the cause of the miscarriage but also provides important clinical information to assist couples preparing for a subsequent pregnancy. 3 The most common chromosomal abnormality to cause a miscarriage is an autosomal trisomy, followed by monosomy X and then polyploidy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical use of testing for foetal chromosomal abnormality is also contentious. Although it was previously thought that women with RM and normal foetal karyotype had worse prognoses for future pregnancies compared with sporadic foetal aneuploidy ( Carp et al , 2001 ; Saravelos and Li, 2012 ), a systematic review found that incidence of chromosomal abnormalities, which accounted for 46% of RM, was not different from sporadic miscarriage ( Smits et al , 2020 ). Recent guidance published in the Lancet recommended that chromosomal testing could be performed for counselling purposes but little evidence is found on its value as a prognostic factor ( Coomarasamy et al , 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Almost 50 years of cytogenetic studies of spontaneous abortions have demonstrated abnormality rates of around 50–60% [ 10 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Trisomies are the most frequently detected anomalies (58–61%), followed by monosomy X (8–13%), polyploidies (2–13%), and structural anomalies (7–9%) [ 11 , 12 , 41 ]. Autosomal monosomies are rare in spontaneous abortion material (0.8–1.5%), and found predominantly in mosaic state [ 13 , 47 , 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Genetic Causes Of Miscarriagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant proportion of miscarriages (50–70%) are caused by chromosomal abnormalities; in addition, more data have appeared on the associations between pregnancy loss and copy number variations (CNVs), gene mutations, methylation abnormalities, and other aberrations [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. One can suggest that the increasing number of studied families and gene variants/CNVs founded in early pregnancy loss highlights the need for their functional assessment in trophoblast development to determine their role in adverse pregnancy outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%