), the NO production in response to LPS in LPS-responsive macrophages was significantly decreased. However, LPS-nonresponsive macrophage cultures produced NO when a combination of LPS and VHSV was used. In the case of a higher VHSV multiplicity of infection (1.78), no significant change was observed in LPSnon-responsive animals. Combinations of LPS with TNF-α, LPS with MAF, and TNF-α with MAF were used to induce NO production in LPS-non-responsive macrophages. In all these cases, VHSV suppressed NO production, although at a significant level only when a combination of TNF-α and MAF was used for the induction of NO.KEY WORDS: Nitric oxide · Lipopolysacharide · Macrophage · Viral hemorrhagic virus · Turbot Scophthalmus maximus · Macrophage activating factor · Tumor necrosis factor α
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherDis Aquat Org 47: [101][102][103][104][105][106][107] 2001 1995, Yin et al. 1997). In the case of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata L., induction of NO production required both macrophage-activating factor (MAF) and LPS (Mulero & Meseguer 1998). In the turbot Scophthalmus maximus, only about one-third of macrophage cultures (30.2%) were significantly stimulated to produce NO by LPS alone (LPS-responsive macrophages), whereas others required a combination of LPS and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), supernatants with MAF activity or supernatants with interferon (IFN)-αβ activity (LPS-non-responsive macrophages) (Tafalla & Novoa 2000). In the presence of LPS, responsive macrophages generate NO more than 2 times higher than non-stimulated controls, while the non-responsive macrophages, in the presence of LPS alone, do not generate NO concentrations significantly higher than non-stimulated controls. A combination of TNF-α and supernatants with MAF activity also stimulated NO production in LPS-nonresponsive macrophages.Analysis of the effects of viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) on NO production is of particular interest since this virus is known to replicate in macrophages (Estepa et al. 1992, Tafalla et al. 1998. VHSV is one of the most devastating viruses in aquaculture, producing great losses in fish production. In recent years, cultured and wild populations of turbot Scophthalmus maximus have experienced significant mortalities due to VHSV outbreaks (Schlotfeldt et al. 1991, Ross et al. 1994. VHSV is known to replicate in turbot kidney macrophages; however, secretion of oxygen dependent radicals (respiratory burst activity) is not significantly affected by in vitro infection with the virus (Tafalla et al. 1998).We have studied the effect of VHSV in vitro infection on turbot macrophage LPS induced NO production in LPS-responsive macrophages, as well as on NO induced by combinations of LPS, TNF-α or MAF in LPS-non-responsive macrophages. We studied the effect of these stimuli on VHSV replication to determine whether alterations in the NO production by the virus could be correlated with changes in the susceptibility of macrophages to VHSV due to these s...