2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytokine release assays: Current practices and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, PBMCs have been efficiently used to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of booster vaccinations [27], [28], [29]. Moreover, a cytokine release assay (CRA) with human PBMCs has also been used as an alternative tool to predict the immunotoxicities of monoclonal antibodies and vaccines [30]. Therefore, PBMCs could be used in alternative approaches to predict the potential for immunotoxicity of PMP products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PBMCs have been efficiently used to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of booster vaccinations [27], [28], [29]. Moreover, a cytokine release assay (CRA) with human PBMCs has also been used as an alternative tool to predict the immunotoxicities of monoclonal antibodies and vaccines [30]. Therefore, PBMCs could be used in alternative approaches to predict the potential for immunotoxicity of PMP products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent discussion by leaders in the field of cytokine storm assays (10), it is accepted that there are no clear and consistent precepts for the range of cytokine storm assays currently used by the pharmaceutical industry. Since the advent of TGN1412, the unifying gold standard for these assays has been detection of cytokine release by anti‐CD28 superagonists but without a predefined criteria for 1) minimum unit, relative (fold) increase, and identity of cytokines released that constitute an adequate mimic of cytokine release syndrome; 2) profile of control antibodies that do not generally activate cytokine release; 3) physiologic conditions that best model the human in vivo situation; and 4) assessment in tissue from specific target patient groups relevant to the particular biologic drug to be tested (personalized medicine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, different assay formats maybe predictive for individual biologics as illustrated by higher cytokine responses to TGN1412 in assays applying peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the context of solid phase drug presentation or high density pre-culture (explained by the inhibitory activity of erythrocytes on T cell responses in whole blood) in contrast to superior responses for alemtuzumab in whole blood assays using aqueous presentation (presumably due to the strong contributions of neutrophilic granulocytes in the Fc-mediated cytokine response and the lack of this cell population in PBMC preparations). A comprehensive overview of mechanisms of cytokine release and assay format to assess human hazard has been provided by Bugelski et al (2009) and the ILSI-Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Immunotoxicology Committee Cytokine Release Assay Working Group (Finco et al, 2014).…”
Section: Cytokine Release: Key Challenges In Human Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%