1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1973.tb08577.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytokinins in Populus×robusta: Changes during Chilling and Bud Burst

Abstract: Cytokinin levels in sap and vegetative buds of Populus x rohusta Schneid have been determined during chilling and bud burst. From non-detectable levels in December and January, parallel increases in cytokinin levels occur in sap and buds during February and March, both in material from the field and that held at 2°C in the dark. The maximum in the sap occurs two weeks prior to natural bud burst, and 3 weeks, prior to the maximum attained in the buds. Excised twigs, forced to bud burst, show a similar pattern. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, some authors believe that treatments with gibberellins can substitute winter chilling (HATCH & WALKER, 1969;WALSER et al, 1981). The rdative inefficiency of kinetin observed by us in this period agrees with the indications that cytokinins probably have some supplementary function in dormancy removal, but are not the primary agent (LAVEE, 1973;HEWETT & WAREING, 1973). The stimulation of sprouting by cytokinins sometimes observed at the end of summer or beginning of autumn (ARIAS & CRABBE, 1975) seems to be in agreement with their generally accepted efficacy in opposing correlative inhibition, such as apical dominance and leaf influence, no longer relevant in autumn-winter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, some authors believe that treatments with gibberellins can substitute winter chilling (HATCH & WALKER, 1969;WALSER et al, 1981). The rdative inefficiency of kinetin observed by us in this period agrees with the indications that cytokinins probably have some supplementary function in dormancy removal, but are not the primary agent (LAVEE, 1973;HEWETT & WAREING, 1973). The stimulation of sprouting by cytokinins sometimes observed at the end of summer or beginning of autumn (ARIAS & CRABBE, 1975) seems to be in agreement with their generally accepted efficacy in opposing correlative inhibition, such as apical dominance and leaf influence, no longer relevant in autumn-winter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…There is a marked increase in cytokinin activity in the ascending xylem sap during bud burst in some woody perennials (7,10,24) been shown to promote the growth of flowers in grapevine cuttings (14). In the present experiment, inflorescences and flowers have been made to grow on young grapevine tendrils by treatment with cytokinins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Generally each of these explants formed only 1 shoot. It has been suggested that developing Populus shoots are a strong sink for cytokinins [12,18], which might explain a reduction in further shoot formation. This is also consistent with results reported by Douglas [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%