2016
DOI: 10.1177/0300985816638721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytologic Criteria for Mast Cell Tumor Grading in Dogs With Evaluation of Clinical Outcome

Abstract: A 2-tiered histologic grading scheme for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs) is based on morphologic characteristics of neoplastic cells, including karyomegaly, multinucleation, nuclear pleomorphism, and mitotic figures. Aspirates from MCTs may provide the same information more quickly, inexpensively, and less invasively. This study used these criteria to develop a cytologic grading scheme for canine MCTs to predict outcome. Three anatomic pathologists graded histologic samples from 152 canine MCTs. Three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
3
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
116
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the discrepancies in the assessment of the mast cell tumour grade, a new simplified classification system was proposed by Kiupel et al (2011), in which MCTs were divided into low-grade MCTs and high-grade MCTs. The 3-grade classification developed by Patnaik (1984) is still widely used by pathologists (Artuković et al 2014, Leidinger et al 2014, the two-grade system devised by Kiupel et al (2011) is commonly applied as well (Camus et al 2016) or both scales are used simultaneously (Śmiech et al 2016). The present study was based on the standard Patnaik scale, as a majority of the collected material originated from the period before the introduction of Kiupel's two-grade scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the discrepancies in the assessment of the mast cell tumour grade, a new simplified classification system was proposed by Kiupel et al (2011), in which MCTs were divided into low-grade MCTs and high-grade MCTs. The 3-grade classification developed by Patnaik (1984) is still widely used by pathologists (Artuković et al 2014, Leidinger et al 2014, the two-grade system devised by Kiupel et al (2011) is commonly applied as well (Camus et al 2016) or both scales are used simultaneously (Śmiech et al 2016). The present study was based on the standard Patnaik scale, as a majority of the collected material originated from the period before the introduction of Kiupel's two-grade scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primary MCTs, further parameters assessed blindly for both stains were the certainty of MCT diagnosis (yes/no) and the cytological grade of malignancy (low/high) according to Camus et al (2016) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytological diagnosis of mast cell tumour (MCT) is considered among the easiest and most consistent, being based on the identification of the characteristic purple intracytoplasmic granules . Furthermore, cytological grading systems have been recently developed for canine MCTs, which can provide useful prognostic information on tumour biological behaviour at the initial visit, thereby contributing to plan the most appropriate therapeutic strategy . Additionally, MCT staging by cytological examination of regional lymph nodes, spleen, liver and bone marrow plays an essential role in the assessment of true disease extent; this procedure holds a well‐acknowledged prognostic value, and again it is critical for therapy planning …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guidelines and consensus statements have been generated for several diagnostic activities, including reference interval establishment (24), prognostic markers in cancer (25), flow cytometric reporting in canine hematopoietic neoplasia (26), immunocytochemical staining (27), and viscoelastic-based hemostasis testing (28), to name a few examples. Similarly, cytologic (29) and histologic (30, 31) grading schemes have been proposed for various tumors. Importantly, these guidelines are the culmination of efforts of multiple investigators and truly represent a global approach (“One Pathology”).…”
Section: Consensus Statements and Standardization Of Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%