1997
DOI: 10.1159/000332796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytologic Nuclear Grade of Malignant Breast Aspirates as a Predictor of Histologic Grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be related to subjectivity in assessment of this characteristic as well as limitation of our eye resolution in detection of subtle grades of nuclear chromasia and granularity with the light microscope. 18 In the present study morphology of chromatin we got 40 % (n=18) cases got score of 2, 37.8% (n=17) cases got score 1and 22.2 %( n=10) cases got score 3.Comparsion of univariate and multiple regression analysis was done with the studies done by Das et al and Lingegowda et al (Table: 6) and (Table: 7). 19 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This might be related to subjectivity in assessment of this characteristic as well as limitation of our eye resolution in detection of subtle grades of nuclear chromasia and granularity with the light microscope. 18 In the present study morphology of chromatin we got 40 % (n=18) cases got score of 2, 37.8% (n=17) cases got score 1and 22.2 %( n=10) cases got score 3.Comparsion of univariate and multiple regression analysis was done with the studies done by Das et al and Lingegowda et al (Table: 6) and (Table: 7). 19 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The progression pattern of nuclear morphometric parameters from benign to atypical, Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), and further to invasive carcinoma, has been emphasized in various studies on histopathology. [34816222324] Although this study had only 8 ADH cases, 7 out of 8 cases had nuclear size below the cut-off value and could be correctly classified as benign on morphometry. One of the ADH cases had higher nuclear size parameters, which could be due to overriding of nuclear/cytoplasmic contours during tracings, magnifications used, and speed of conducting analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nuclear morphometry is capable of detecting changes that are too small to be visually perceived and could be used effectively to classify the inconclusive breast FNACs. [3] When combined with cytology impression, morphometry can improve distinction between benign and malignant lesions, especially in areas of “gray zone,” and thus help resolve cases with diagnostic dilemma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apesar de ser método útil no diagnósti-co de carcinoma de mama, existem, ainda, poucos dados a respeito da acurácia da PAAF em estabelecer fatores prognósticos, tais como: o grau histológico e nuclear, o índice mitótico, receptores hormonais, genes de supressão tumoral/ oncogene e o conteúdo de DNA 7 . Alguns estudos têm mostrado que a graduação citológica nos esfregaços de carcinoma de mama correlaciona-se bem com a graduação histológica, sendo altamente reprodutível 7,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . Contudo, a graduação citológica de PAAF de mama não é rotineiramente utilizada 17 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified