1997
DOI: 10.1159/000332797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytology of “Significant” Breast Ductal Proliferations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually the indication for FNAC is to rule out malignancy. [23] In the present study, we observed 4 (1.43%) cases of phyllodes which is similar to reported by Likhar et al [15] in 2013.The number of malignant lesions in the present study was 46 (16.43%) cases which is in concordance with Park and Han [11] , Rochar et al [12] and Dominguer et al [13] . Maximum number of malignant cases were in 41 to 50 years of age group which is similar to the results by Khan et al [24] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Usually the indication for FNAC is to rule out malignancy. [23] In the present study, we observed 4 (1.43%) cases of phyllodes which is similar to reported by Likhar et al [15] in 2013.The number of malignant lesions in the present study was 46 (16.43%) cases which is in concordance with Park and Han [11] , Rochar et al [12] and Dominguer et al [13] . Maximum number of malignant cases were in 41 to 50 years of age group which is similar to the results by Khan et al [24] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Another subject of continuing debate is whether FNA cytology is an effective tool for distinguishing between atypical ductal hyperplasia and higher-grade lesions. Although, in a previous study, 17 we highlighted the usefulness of cytology in this respect, its role has been questioned. 18 These issues being of paramount importance, attention was once focused on the cytoplasmic features of carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[7,10,11,24] Therefore, it is necessary that an accurate diagnosis on cytology be offered. [8,12,13,15,25,26] Of these, we have studied the criteria put forth by Masood et al [10] We have found the six cytological parameters proposed by Masood et al, [4] which are useful for cytological scoring of breast lesions. We found that to increase the accuracy of various groups, the scoring index be slightly modified; NPBD, which had score of 6-10, was modified to score of 6-8 with shift of score 9 and 10 to PBD without atypia, i.e., score 11-14 is modified to score 9-14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%