2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02676-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytomegalovirus disease in de novo kidney-transplant recipients: comparison of everolimus-based immunosuppression without prophylaxis with mycophenolic acid-based immunosuppression with prophylaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that CMV recurrence occurred in 43% of patients in the control group, whereas the sirolimus group had no recurrence (p ≤ 0.0001) [85]. In de novo kidney-transplant recipients, avoiding CMV infection/disease can be achieved to some extent by replacing the antiproliferative agent (mycophenolic acid) with everolimus [19,86].…”
Section: Viral Reactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found that CMV recurrence occurred in 43% of patients in the control group, whereas the sirolimus group had no recurrence (p ≤ 0.0001) [85]. In de novo kidney-transplant recipients, avoiding CMV infection/disease can be achieved to some extent by replacing the antiproliferative agent (mycophenolic acid) with everolimus [19,86].…”
Section: Viral Reactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%