2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients from living donors with and without valganciclovir prophylaxis and with immunosuppression based on anti-thymocyte globulin or basiliximab

Abstract: Background:In our population, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) of 1 mg/Kg/day for 4 days is used; which permits not using valgancyclovir (VGC) prophylaxis in some renal transplant recipients (RTR) with moderate risk (R+), to reduce costs. This study aimed to determine the incidence and risk of developing cytomegalovirus (CMV), with or without prophylaxis, when exposed to low doses of ATG or basiliximab (BSL). Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort included 265 RTR with follow-up of 12 months. Prophylaxis wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Valacyclovir had greater efficacy than acyclovir in preventing CMV infection [ 17 ]. Although there was evidence that a low dose of ATG was associated with lower CMV-free survival than basiliximab [ 18 ], there was no significant difference in the infection rate between the 2 groups in our study. This could be because in our study only 8 patients received ATG as induction therapy, while 64 patients received basiliximab.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Valacyclovir had greater efficacy than acyclovir in preventing CMV infection [ 17 ]. Although there was evidence that a low dose of ATG was associated with lower CMV-free survival than basiliximab [ 18 ], there was no significant difference in the infection rate between the 2 groups in our study. This could be because in our study only 8 patients received ATG as induction therapy, while 64 patients received basiliximab.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The different outcomes may be due to the use of cyclosporin in other studies and use of tacrolimus in our research. Regarding the maintenance of immunosuppression therapy, we followed the guideline of tacrolimus blood level 7–10 ng/mL and a 1.5–2 g/day dose of MMF [ 18 ]. A higher tacrolimus trough level was reported to be an independent risk factor for BK infection in Chinese and Tunisian renal transplant recipients [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of certain T-cell depleting agents (ATG, alemtuzumab) (13,15,16) and high doses of immunosuppressive agents have been shown to be associated with increases in the risk of CMV (7). Additionally, younger age (17,18), African American race, use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), and PRA ≥80% (25) are associated with decreased risk of CMV infection, and hence, decreased need for CMV prophylaxis. There is some evidence that basiliximab is negatively associated with CMV infection and the need for prophylaxis (17,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, younger age (17,18), African American race, use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), and PRA ≥80% (25) are associated with decreased risk of CMV infection, and hence, decreased need for CMV prophylaxis. There is some evidence that basiliximab is negatively associated with CMV infection and the need for prophylaxis (17,26). Our findings were mostly consistent in this regard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCMV infection is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity in renal-transplant recipients [5]. The Behnezhad/Parhizgari/Shafiei-Jandaghi/ Yavarian/Mokhtari-Azad Intervirology 2023;66:1-7 2 DOI: 10.1159/000526095 infection of HCMV varies from 17.8% to 63.2% in renaltransplant recipients [6]. The highest risk for HCMV infection in renal-transplant recipients happens when the donor is seropositive and the recipient is seronegative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%