2018
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

cytometree: A binary tree algorithm for automatic gating in cytometry analysis

Abstract: Flow cytometry is a powerful technology that allows the high-throughput quantification of dozens of surface and intracellular proteins at the single-cell level. It has become the most widely used technology for immunophenotyping of cells over the past three decades. Due to the increasing complexity of cytometry experiments (more cells and more markers), traditional manual flow cytometry data analysis has become untenable due to its subjectivity and time-consuming nature. We present a new unsupervised algorithm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An evolution of these algorithms is represented by tools that automatically identify the gating strategy. Cytometree, implemented as R package, aims to construct a binary tree in which the nodes represent gates and the binary tree represents the best mono-dimensional sequential gating strategy used to identify the cellular sub-populations [18]. The AutoGate software has been recently implemented with the Exhaustive Projection Pursuit (EPP) clustering approach which automatically detects the best two-dimensional gating strategy to identify the cellular sub-populations [19].…”
Section: Automated Sequential Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evolution of these algorithms is represented by tools that automatically identify the gating strategy. Cytometree, implemented as R package, aims to construct a binary tree in which the nodes represent gates and the binary tree represents the best mono-dimensional sequential gating strategy used to identify the cellular sub-populations [18]. The AutoGate software has been recently implemented with the Exhaustive Projection Pursuit (EPP) clustering approach which automatically detects the best two-dimensional gating strategy to identify the cellular sub-populations [19].…”
Section: Automated Sequential Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is based on a binary tree in which each node represents a subpopulation of cells. The algorithm has showed an excellent performance compared to other unsupervised algorithms ECLIPSE (Elimination of Cells Lying in Pattern Similar to Endogeneity) is a tool mainly designed to identify healthy cells (only one specific cell type) in FCM data.…”
Section: Cell Population Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, deep learning algorithms perform well with huge multidimensional datasets that are datasets characterized by a high number of events and a high number of markers. Most recent FCM technology can analyze up to 50 different markers, and the technology improves continuously, increasing the complexity of cytometry experiments . Therefore, the use of deep learning algorithms to analyze FCM data will likely increase in the future …”
Section: Cell Population Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, to best leverage the new wealth of complex flow cytometry data for gaining novel and biologically relevant insight, a combination of different computational approaches might be best suited, and should be paired with robust statistical analyses. A very recent addition to the suite of unsupervised tools that appears promising in this context is cytometree, which implements unsupervised gating based on binary tree algorithms (12). A non-exhaustive overview of the main features of typical supervised and unsupervised analysis tools relative to manual gating is provided in Figure 1 In general, there seems to be consensus that computational analysis methods for flow cytometry data need to gain more widespread implementation (13), but the number of available options can be overwhelming for the typical bench immunologist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%