2013
DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.111811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytomorphology of Boerhaave's syndrome: A critical value in cytology

Abstract: Spontaneous esophageal perforation into the pleural cavity (Boerhaave's syndrome) is a rare life-threatening condition, which requires early diagnosis and urgent management. The diagnosis of such critical condition in many cases is delayed because of atypical clinical presentation, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Cytological examination of pleural fluid can provide early, fast and accurate diagnosis of such critical condition and help in better and early management of this disease. We describe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CytoJournal editorial board and cytopathology foundation (CF) thank all CytoJournal peer reviewers for their devotion by extending their significant efforts, time, and resources by completing the review process of all cytojournal manuscripts in a timely manner published during 2012 [ Table 1 ][ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ] and 2013 [ Table 2 ]. [ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ] The overall acceptance rate was 52% during 2012 and 54% during 2013. Hence, there were many more manuscripts, which were reviewed but recommended for non-acceptance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CytoJournal editorial board and cytopathology foundation (CF) thank all CytoJournal peer reviewers for their devotion by extending their significant efforts, time, and resources by completing the review process of all cytojournal manuscripts in a timely manner published during 2012 [ Table 1 ][ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ] and 2013 [ Table 2 ]. [ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ] The overall acceptance rate was 52% during 2012 and 54% during 2013. Hence, there were many more manuscripts, which were reviewed but recommended for non-acceptance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%