1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4896-2_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoplasmic effects on quality traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
15
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those reported by Ekiz et al (1998) and Sharma and Sharma (2007). From a breeder's point of view, the h 2 n estimates from the two sites show that the Chili x Cocorit 71 cross has the greatest chance of genetic improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results are similar to those reported by Ekiz et al (1998) and Sharma and Sharma (2007). From a breeder's point of view, the h 2 n estimates from the two sites show that the Chili x Cocorit 71 cross has the greatest chance of genetic improvement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the present study, neither agronomic characteristics nor quality characteristics showed a significant difference between reciprocal crosses, indicating no cytoplasmic effect on these characteristics. This result is consistent with those of Atienza et al (2007) who reported that reciprocal F1 lines did not differ for any of the agronomic traits evaluated with the exception of anthesis date, but disagreed with those of Ekiz et al (1998) and Rajcan et al (2002) who reported significant differences in reciprocal crosses for 1000-kernel weight, protein content, grain hardness, and days to maturity in some crosses.…”
Section: Agronomic and Quality Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Besides, different qualitative and quantitative characters including yield and its components are known to be influenced by cytoplasmic genes. Thus there is a strong argument for cytoplasmic diversification of hybrids for improving yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Scheifele et al 1970;Rai et al 1996;Delorme et al 1997;Ekiz et al 1998;Bao and Xia 1999;Stamp et al 2000;Moran and Rooney 2003;Tao et al 2004). Also, the availability of various CMS sources in a crop species provides an array of choices to the plant breeders to diversify both genetic and cytoplasmic bases in hybrid cultivars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%