2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504107102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoplasmic SnoN in normal tissues and nonmalignant cells antagonizes TGF-β signaling by sequestration of the Smad proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TGF-␤ pathway is strongly regulated at the level of Smad activation and nuclear translocation by different means. One mechanism involves Smad sequestration in the cytosol by proteins acting as repressors such as SnoN (31,32) or AKT (33,34). However, these proteins do not seem to participate in our system, because neither SnoN knockdown nor AKT inhibition with LY294002 was able to recover response to TGF-␤ in PTP1B-deficient cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…TGF-␤ pathway is strongly regulated at the level of Smad activation and nuclear translocation by different means. One mechanism involves Smad sequestration in the cytosol by proteins acting as repressors such as SnoN (31,32) or AKT (33,34). However, these proteins do not seem to participate in our system, because neither SnoN knockdown nor AKT inhibition with LY294002 was able to recover response to TGF-␤ in PTP1B-deficient cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Examples of such Smad repressors are Ski and SnoN, as described in the previous section. According to the current model, Ski and SnoN seem to play dual roles in cancer progression, despite the fact that previous knowledge favored an oncogenic role for these proteins [88,[105][106][107]. The oncogenic potential of Ski and SnoN is known to be mediated by their ability to bind directly to nuclear Smad complexes and repress their transcriptional activities [85,[108][109][110][111].…”
Section: Relevance Of Stability Regulation Of Tgfβ Pathway Componentsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition to the up-regulation of Ski or SnoN expression, mislocalization may also contribute to malignant progression. SnoN is localized exclusively in the nucleus in cancer tissues, whereas in normal tissues and nontumorigenic cells, SnoN is predominantly cytoplasmic (42). The mechanism of transformation by Ski and SnoN was not defined until diverse studies converged on the conclusion that Ski/SnoN bind directly to the Smad3/4 complex and negatively regulate TGF-␤ signaling (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%