2018
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers: fad or standard of care?

Abstract: Peritoneal metastases (PM) are the common endpoint for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers.PM from these cancers are often managed in a similar fashion to other sites of systemic metastases, but the following must be taken into consideration. (a) PM do not respond to systemic chemotherapy in the same fashion as liver and lung metastases. (b) PM cause local problems, resulting in disruption of chemotherapy. (c) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) actually … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the option of surgery as a potential curative treatment is standardly offered to patients with hepatic metastatic colorectal disease. Furthermore, even though the addition of treatment modalities like cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have been shown to prolong survival in selected patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological tumors there is in an ongoing debate about the best management of patients with metastatic disease [ 19 21 ]. Although some retrospective studies suggest an improved survival of patients with surgical resection of metastases for EGAC [ 22 , 23 ], there is a lack of prospective, randomized evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the option of surgery as a potential curative treatment is standardly offered to patients with hepatic metastatic colorectal disease. Furthermore, even though the addition of treatment modalities like cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have been shown to prolong survival in selected patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological tumors there is in an ongoing debate about the best management of patients with metastatic disease [ 19 21 ]. Although some retrospective studies suggest an improved survival of patients with surgical resection of metastases for EGAC [ 22 , 23 ], there is a lack of prospective, randomized evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the option of surgery as a potential curative treatment is standardly offered to patients with hepatic metastatic colorectal disease. Furthermore, even though the addition of treatment modalities like cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have been shown to prolong survival in selected patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological tumors there is in an ongoing debate about the best management of patients with metastatic disease [19][20][21]. Although some retrospective studies suggest an improved survival of patients with surgical resection of metastases for EGAC [22,23], there is a lack of prospective, randomized evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 2006 consensus statement, it was recognised that standardization of CRS and HIPEC technique significantly improved survival of Stage IV colon cancer (17). As a reflection of procedural complexity, there is a wide range of reported perioperative morbidity (40-80%) and mortality (3-20%) (18). Improvements with appropriate patient selection, high-volume surgeon and centre experience, standardization of CRS and HIPEC and in perioperative management continue to develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%