2014
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytosine deaminase as a negative selectable marker for the microalgal chloroplast: a strategy for the isolation of nuclear mutations that affect chloroplast gene expression

Abstract: Negative selectable markers are useful tools for forward-genetic screens aimed at identifying trans-acting factors that are required for expression of specific genes. Transgenic lines harbouring the marker fused to a gene element, such as a promoter, may be mutagenized to isolate loss-of-function mutants able to survive under selection. Such a strategy allows the molecular dissection of factors that are essential for expression of the gene. Expression of individual chloroplast genes in plants and algae typical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping of this mutation confirms that the TAA1 gene was properly identified. Using a different genetic screen, Young and Purton (2014) identified several PSI-deficient mutants that could be rescued by transformation with TAA1 genomic DNA (cosmid 64B4). In one of these mutants, allelism to taa1 was confirmed by the presence of a mutation creating a stop codon in exon 5 of TAA1.…”
Section: Identification Of the Taa1 Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping of this mutation confirms that the TAA1 gene was properly identified. Using a different genetic screen, Young and Purton (2014) identified several PSI-deficient mutants that could be rescued by transformation with TAA1 genomic DNA (cosmid 64B4). In one of these mutants, allelism to taa1 was confirmed by the presence of a mutation creating a stop codon in exon 5 of TAA1.…”
Section: Identification Of the Taa1 Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to positive selectable markers, negative selectable markers represent factors that confer sensitivity towards a certain compound once expressed in the host cell and can be useful e.g., to identify trans-acting factors (Young and Purton 2014) or as markers for gene silencing approaches (Jiang et al 2014;Rohr et al 2004). Three established negative selectable marker for C. reinhardtii are the endogenous MAA7 gene (encoding the tryptophan synthase ß subunit; presence leads to sensitivity to 5-fluoroindole) (Rohr et al 2004), the endogenous FKBP12 gene (encoding the 12-kD FK506-binding protein; presence leads to sensitivity to rapamycin) (Crespo et al 2005), and the E. coli codA gene (encoding cytosine deaminase; presence leads to sensitivity to 5-fluorocytosine) (Young and Purton 2014).…”
Section: Transformation Markers and Reportersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three established negative selectable marker for C. reinhardtii are the endogenous MAA7 gene (encoding the tryptophan synthase ß subunit; presence leads to sensitivity to 5-fluoroindole) (Rohr et al 2004), the endogenous FKBP12 gene (encoding the 12-kD FK506-binding protein; presence leads to sensitivity to rapamycin) (Crespo et al 2005), and the E. coli codA gene (encoding cytosine deaminase; presence leads to sensitivity to 5-fluorocytosine) (Young and Purton 2014).…”
Section: Transformation Markers and Reportersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we have explored multigenic engineering by combining two approaches: namely, the integration of three gene cassettes into a single neutral locus, followed by a further round of transformation to integrate a fourth gene cassette plus the aadA marker cassette at a second locus. The four genes were selected from previous studies in our group where each coding sequence was codon-optimised for expression in the chloroplast, and each was modified to encode the haemagglutinin epitope tag (HA-tag), YPYDVPDYA at the C terminus [25]. The gene products are unrelated, and were chosen based on their different sizes and the different levels of accumulation observed previously in chloroplast transformants expressing just the single gene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%