“…One possible reason for the apparent lesser cytosolic penetration of heterochiral peptides is increased susceptibility to degradation for homochiral l -peptides, which could lead to a false positive CAPA signal. While we cannot rule this out completely, previous work has shown little evidence of degradation effects on CAPA data, as measured with diverse linear and stapled peptides and canonical CPPs with similar lengths and overall sequences. ,,,, The poorer cytosolic penetration by heterochiral peptides is consistent with prior work showing that display of arginine side chains in a structured array, such as on one face of an α-helix, contributes to efficient cytosolic penetration and/or endosomal escape. ,, While these peptides are too short to maintain secondary structures at RT, optimal binding to membrane components could be promoted by a structured conformation such as an α-helix. , If this is the case, the heterochiral library would be generally expected to have poorer helical propensity and thus poorer membrane binding and/or endosomal escape. Still, within Library 2, a subset of peptides appeared more penetrant than others with the same number of d -arginines, such as het43 (Figure B).…”