2023
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2167122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytosporone E analogues as BRD4 inhibitors for cancer treatment: molecular docking and molecular dynamic investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, all four lead compounds showed a stable RMSF with negligible fluctuation in the regions of both NBDs. Previous MD simulation studies demonstrated that fluctuations on the order of 1-3 Å can be indicative of stable docking for bimolecular systems [64,65]; however, in the case of larger proteins like ABCB1, a slightly larger fluctuation (4-5 Å) in RMSD is also acceptable [43]. Prior MD simulations of substrates in comparison with inhibitors of ABCB1 showed more fluctuation with the substrates in the RMSF of the nucleotide-binding region as compared to inhibitors [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, all four lead compounds showed a stable RMSF with negligible fluctuation in the regions of both NBDs. Previous MD simulation studies demonstrated that fluctuations on the order of 1-3 Å can be indicative of stable docking for bimolecular systems [64,65]; however, in the case of larger proteins like ABCB1, a slightly larger fluctuation (4-5 Å) in RMSD is also acceptable [43]. Prior MD simulations of substrates in comparison with inhibitors of ABCB1 showed more fluctuation with the substrates in the RMSF of the nucleotide-binding region as compared to inhibitors [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%