Cytotoxic and osteogenic effects of crocin and bicarbonate from calcium phosphates for potential chemopreventative and anti-inflammatory applications in vitro and in vivo
“…The hydrogels pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 were tested for in vitro toxicity against HCEC cells upon their incubation for a period of 24 h. The incubation of HCEC cells in the presence of pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 discs decreased their viability by 64.4 ± 5.7 and 72.8 ± 8.5%, respectively, compared with the cells that were incubated with pure pHEMA. According to ISO 10993-5, if the percent of cell viability is higher than ≥70%, then the material should be considered as non-cytotoxic [ 28 , 29 ]; therefore, the materials tested in this work are considered as low or nontoxic.…”
Eucalyptus leaves (ELE) and willow bark (WBE) extracts were utilized towards the formation of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs(ELE), AgNPs(WBE)). AgNPs(ELE) and AgNPs(WBE) were dispersed in polymer hydrogels to create pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 using hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA). The materials were characterized in a solid state by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRPD), thermogravimetric differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DTG/DSC) and attenuated total reflection spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and ultraviolet visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy in solution. The antimicrobial potential of the materials was investigated against the Gram-negative bacterial strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and the Gram-positive bacterial strain of the genus Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which are involved in microbial keratitis. The percentage of bacterial viability of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis upon their incubation over the pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 discs is interestingly low (28.3 and 6.8% respectively), while the inhibition zones (IZ) formed are 12.3 ± 1.7 and 13.2 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. No in vitro toxicity of this material towards human corneal epithelial cells (HCEC) was detected. Despite its low performance against S. aureus, pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 could be an efficient candidate towards the development of contact lenses that reduces microbial infection risk.
“…The hydrogels pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 were tested for in vitro toxicity against HCEC cells upon their incubation for a period of 24 h. The incubation of HCEC cells in the presence of pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 discs decreased their viability by 64.4 ± 5.7 and 72.8 ± 8.5%, respectively, compared with the cells that were incubated with pure pHEMA. According to ISO 10993-5, if the percent of cell viability is higher than ≥70%, then the material should be considered as non-cytotoxic [ 28 , 29 ]; therefore, the materials tested in this work are considered as low or nontoxic.…”
Eucalyptus leaves (ELE) and willow bark (WBE) extracts were utilized towards the formation of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs(ELE), AgNPs(WBE)). AgNPs(ELE) and AgNPs(WBE) were dispersed in polymer hydrogels to create pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 and pHEMA@AgNPs(WBE)_2 using hydroxyethyl-methacrylate (HEMA). The materials were characterized in a solid state by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy, X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRPD), thermogravimetric differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DTG/DSC) and attenuated total reflection spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and ultraviolet visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy in solution. The antimicrobial potential of the materials was investigated against the Gram-negative bacterial strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and the Gram-positive bacterial strain of the genus Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), which are involved in microbial keratitis. The percentage of bacterial viability of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis upon their incubation over the pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 discs is interestingly low (28.3 and 6.8% respectively), while the inhibition zones (IZ) formed are 12.3 ± 1.7 and 13.2 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. No in vitro toxicity of this material towards human corneal epithelial cells (HCEC) was detected. Despite its low performance against S. aureus, pHEMA@AgNPs(ELE)_2 could be an efficient candidate towards the development of contact lenses that reduces microbial infection risk.
“…The %MIA(C) of 1 – 4 lies between −18.2 and −28.3%, whereas for the micelles SLS@ 1 – 4 , it is in a similar range (between −16.2 and −25.5%). According to ISO 10993-5 that regulates the “Biological evaluation of medical devicesPart 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity”, if the percent of viability is higher than 70% upon treatment with an agent, this agent is considered as noncytotoxic . Therefore, conjugates 1 – 4 and their micelles are considered as nontoxic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization acknowledge that the data from this bioassay are effective and reliable in the determination of genotoxicity. 54 Moreover, the Allium cepa assay correlates to the results obtained from mammal test systems because of the similarity in chromosomal morphology. 33 Genotoxic effects of agents can be investigated by using bioindicator parameters such as the mitotic index (MI), chromosomal aberration (CA), nuclear abnormalities (NA), and micronucleus (MN) frequencies.…”
{[Ag8(Mef)8(μ2-S,O-DMSO)2(μ2-O-DMSO)2(O-DMSO)8]·2(H2O)} (1), [Ag(Mef)(tpP)2] (2),
[Ag(Mef)(tpAs)3] (3), and {2 [Ag(Mef)(tpSb)3] (DMSO)} (4) were obtained by the conjugation
of mefenamic acid (MefH), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID),
with a mitochondriotropic derivative of pnictogen tpE (tp = triphenyl
group; E = P, As, and Sb) through silver(I). Their hydrophilicity
was adjusted by their dispersion into sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS),
forming SLS@1–4. 1–4 and SLS@1–4 were characterized
by their spectral data and X-ray crystallography. They inhibit the
proliferation of human breast adenocarcinoma cells MCF-7 (hormone-dependent
(HD)) and MDA-MB-231 (hormone-independent (HI)). X-ray fluorescence
reveals the Ag cellular uptake. The in vitro and in vivo nongenotoxicity was confirmed with micronucleus
(MN), Artemia salina, and Allium cepa assays. Their mechanism of action was studied by cell morphology,
DNA fragmentation, acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining,
cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial membrane permeabilization tests,
DNA binding affinity, and LOX inhibitory activity and was rationalized
by regression analysis.
“…In contrast, the in vivo application of crocin showed pro-apoptotic and antiinflammatory effects in a rat model of femoral inflammation. These results suggest that crocin may have a therapeutic effect on osteosarcoma regulation and potential for use in wound healing during bone tissue regeneration (Koski et al, 2020). Studies have shown that in some diseases involving bone degeneration and dysregulation of bone homeostasis besides osteogenesis, the influence of osteoclast formation and osteoimmunomodulation is important (Chen et al, 2017b; Chen…”
Section: Effects Of Crocin On Cell Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The final product of these cascades is the expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and other enzymes, which are involved in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption (Asagiri and Takayanagi, 2007) Crocin can be considered a safe substance to promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs (B. Li et al, 2020) hBMSCs/10-50 µM (10-500 mg/ml) Increased LAP activity, calcium nodules, and RUNX2, COL1A1, and OCN expression, decreased GSK-3β phosphorylation Crocin is effective in in-vitro and in-vivo osteogenic models Zhu et al (2019) M2 macrophages and BMSCs/40 and 80 µM (400-800 mg/ml) Promoted M2 phenotype that was decreased in antiinflammatory cytokine-induced osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in co-culture with pre-treated macrophages through inhibition of p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling Crocin has therapeutic potential for bone degenerative diseases through induction of M2 macrophage polarization, resulting in inflammation reduction and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs Koski et al (2020) hFOBs and MG-63 cell line, Rats/ 45 µg (450 mg/ml) Increased osteoblast proliferation and decreased osteosarcoma viability and pro-apoptotic and antiinflammatory effects in-vivo Crocin has a potential therapeutic effect on osteosarcoma regulation and uses for wound healing during bone tissue regeneration Crocin decreases osteoclast function and differentiation and bone resorption in-vitro, as well reduction in bone resorption activity of osteoclasts osteoclast-specific gene expression, including NFATc1, c-Fos, and cathepsin, are involved, leading to inhibition of bone resorption activity (Fu et al, 2017). A similar study by Shi et al demonstrated that crocin downregulates osteoclast differentiation via inhibition of JNK and NF-κB signaling pathways in BMM cells in vitro.…”
Section: Effects Of Crocin On Cell Differentiationmentioning
Crocin, the main biologically active carotenoid of saffron, generally is derived from the dried trifid stigma of Crocus sativus L. Many studies have demonstrated that crocin has several therapeutic effects on biological systems through its anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The wide range of crocin activities is believed to be because of its ability to anchor to many proteins, triggering some cellular pathways responsible for cell proliferation and differentiation. It also has therapeutic potentials in arthritis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and articular pain probably due to its anti-inflammatory properties. Anti-apoptotic effects, as well as osteoclast inhibition effects of crocin, have suggested it as a natural substance to treat osteoporosis and degenerative disease of bone and cartilage. Different mechanisms underlying crocin effects on bone and cartilage repair have been investigated, but remain to be fully elucidated. The present review aims to undertake current knowledge on the effects of crocin on bone and cartilage degenerative diseases with an emphasis on its proliferative and differentiative properties in mesenchymal stem cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.