Over the last decade, there has been increasing development of new manufactured nanomaterials. There is increasing recognition that nanoparticles may pose a risk to human health. Findings from the toxicology studies have indicated that specific properties of nanoparticles drive their toxicity. These properties include surface area and chemistry, size and shape of particles, as well as charge and number, but to a lesser extent, mass. Reference materials for manufactured nanoparticle toxicology studies have to be developed to carry out comparable assessment of nanoparticles with different properties.The result of REFNANO (Reference materials for engineered nanoparticle toxicology and metrology) project was consensus (Table 1) reached between toxicology and metrology communities in the following outputs (www.iom-world.org/pubs/REFNANOReport.pdf): -a rationale for the selection of priority reference/test materials (consideration of rationales from toxicological and metrological points of view and potential uses of reference materials led to proposal of three selection criteria: A -Industrial = particles in high volume production, examples: CB, TiO 2 , CNT; B -Hypothesis-testing = particles possessing attributes that help understand mechanisms of toxicity, examples: long and short CNT, nanoand micro-sizes, coated and uncoated; C -Distributed analysis = particles chosen as high and low toxicity standards or associated with well-established risks, examples: Ni, diesel exhaust particulate, alumina;-a priority listing of reference/test materials to meet the needs of toxicology and metrology are given in Table 1 (highest priority nanomaterials after REFNANO evaluation are given in the table including valuable comments on key issues related to each particular material class);-information related to the quantities of materials needed and the matrix in which they are present (for UK 100 lab-