2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2014.00201.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Czech Higher Education Students — Viewpoints and Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific items used to measure this attitude come from prior research and practice. They include overall quality of course (Hamilton et al 2002;Summers et al 2005); overall quality of instructor (Indiana Wesleyan University 2006); overall quality of classroom and facilities (Harvey 2001;Bastova et al 2004;Shank et al 1995;Wiers-Jenssen et al 2002); the intent to recommend the school to a friend ( Student Workload This describes the student's perceptions regarding the amount of work and time to complete course assignments, study, and prepare for a class. Student workload is measured by the aggregate score of five items used in previous studies: reasonableness of work in this course (Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Summers et al 2005), volume of work in the course (Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Richardson 2005), amount of course content for the time period of the course (Hill 1995;Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Tan and Kek 2004), timing and scheduling of course assignments (Harvey 2001), study time and class preparation (Hamilton et al 2002).…”
Section: Student Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific items used to measure this attitude come from prior research and practice. They include overall quality of course (Hamilton et al 2002;Summers et al 2005); overall quality of instructor (Indiana Wesleyan University 2006); overall quality of classroom and facilities (Harvey 2001;Bastova et al 2004;Shank et al 1995;Wiers-Jenssen et al 2002); the intent to recommend the school to a friend ( Student Workload This describes the student's perceptions regarding the amount of work and time to complete course assignments, study, and prepare for a class. Student workload is measured by the aggregate score of five items used in previous studies: reasonableness of work in this course (Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Summers et al 2005), volume of work in the course (Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Richardson 2005), amount of course content for the time period of the course (Hill 1995;Mustafa and Chiang 2006;Tan and Kek 2004), timing and scheduling of course assignments (Harvey 2001), study time and class preparation (Hamilton et al 2002).…”
Section: Student Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bastova et al (2004), in the last decade, a fairly significant and rapid increase in the number of higher education students in the Czech higher education system was made possible through a corresponding increase in the number of higher education institutions and faculties, and enlargement of existing institutions. Bastova et al (2004) pointed out that the number of students had more than doubled between the academic years 1989/1990 and 2002/2003. However, they added that the demand still significantly outnumbered the supply.…”
Section: Current Quality Development Practices In Czech Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When trying to describe the ideal involvement of student and staff in such processes, the concept of quality culture has in the latter years often been highlighted as a description of the social processes intended to characterise well‐functioning quality systems and quality work processes (Baštová et al. , 2004; Rozsnyai, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%