Czech Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and Validation in Incurable Patients

Kisvetrová, Helena; Školoudík, David; Danielová, Libuše; Langová, Kateřina; Váverková, Renáta; Bretšnajdrová, Milena; Yamada, Yukari

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.008

Cited by 20 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The respondents saw the research as an opportunity to talk to someone about their illness and other important aspects of life. This confirms that the PDI-CZ is not only a measurement tool, but can also be used as an intervention because it facilitates professional communication with the geriatric inpatient with in LTC (Kisvetrová et al, 2018).…”

Section: Geriatric Depression Scale (Gds-15supporting

confidence: 65%

“…The intensity tells us how this is perceived by the respondent as a problem or cause for concern in relation to a threat to perceived dignity (higher score presents greater threat of dignity) ( Chochinov et al, 2008 ). In our study, we used a validated Czech version (PDI-CZ; Kisvetrová et al, 2018 ), which was validated for the needs of Czech nursing practice. PDI-CZ has high reliability (α = .92) and contains four domains.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dignity and Predictors of Its Change Among Inpatients in Long-Term Care

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to identify any differences in the dignity evaluation of geriatric inpatients after 1 month of hospitalization in a long-term care wards (LTC) and predictors of this change. This follow-up study included 125 geriatric inpatients who filled the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-CZ), Geriatric Depression Scale, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination. In the initial measurement, the patients rated of PDI-CZ item “Not able to perform tasks of daily living” the worst. One month after, the items “Not able to perform tasks of daily living,” “Not able to attend to bodily functions,” and “Not feeling worthwhile or valued” were improved. Patients with higher education, for whom self-sufficiency improved and depression decreased, rated their dignity more positively 1 month after the hospitalization in LTC. Our findings suggest that these factors are important for the maintenance of the dignity of older adults hospitalized in LTC.

show abstract

Section: Geriatric Depression Scale (Gds-15supporting

confidence: 65%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dignity and Predictors of Its Change Among Inpatients in Long-Term Care

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the next step is psychometric testing, such as factor analysis and test-retest of the PDI-SWE in a larger group of patients. PDI has been translated and validated in different countries with satisfactory psychometric results (Albers et al, 2011;Ripamonti et al, 2012;Sautier et al, 2014;Rullan et al, 2015;Parpa et al, 2017;Kisvetrova et al, 2018). In a recent review focusing on identifying PROMs suitable for use in palliative care for clinical practice and/or research purposes, the PDI received the highest score (Johnston et al, 2017a).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a screening tool, the PDI has been shown to be beneficial, ensuring that issues causing dignity-related distress can be identified in a holistic way (Chochinov et al, 2012). The PDI has been adapted to, and validated for use in, diverse countries, including the Netherlands (Albers et al, 2011), Czech Republic (Kisvetrova et al, 2018), Italy (Ripamonti et al, 2012), Germany (Sautier et al, 2014), Greece (Parpa et al, 2017), and Spain (Rullan et al, 2015), but not Sweden.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Translating the Patient Dignity Inventory

Blomberg

Lindqvist²,

Harstäde

et al. 2019

Int J Palliat Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) is based on an empirically-driven dignity model that has been developed and used for clinically assessing the various sources of dignity-related distress. In a recent review, it received the highest score as a useful instrument in both practice and research in palliative care. The PDI has been adapted to and validated for use in various countries, but not yet Sweden. Aims: To translate the PDI into Swedish, including cultural adaptation for clinical use. Methods: A multi-step process of translation, negotiated consensus, expert group discussion (n=7: four invited experts and three researchers) and cognitive interviewing (n=7: persons with palliative care needs). Findings: Discussion, by the expert reviewers, of both linguistic and cultural issues regarding the content and readability of the translated Swedish version resulted in revisions of items and response alternatives, focusing mainly on semantic, conceptual, and experiential equivalence. A pilot version for cognitive interviews was produced. The analysis of data showed that most of the items were judged to be relevant by the persons with palliative care needs. Conclusion: The process of translation and adaptation added clarity and consistency. The Swedish version of the PDI can be used in assessing dignity-related distress. The next step will be to test this Swedish version for psychometric properties in a larger group of patients with palliative care needs before use in research.

show abstract

“…There was also proven a significant correlation among all the factors (subscales). the individual correlations are shown in table 14. the study has shown that the PDi-CZ Czech version has good psychometric features and is therefore appropriate to use also in international studies (Kisvetrová et al, 2018b). in the Czech version of the PDi-CZ, items are divided into four subscales corresponding to the four factors determined based on the result of the factor analysis (Kisvetrová et al, 2018b).…”

Section: C) Reverse Translation To the Original (English) Languagementioning

confidence: 99%