2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.05563
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$D^*_{+}$: A Generic Platform-Agnostic and Risk-Aware Path Planing Framework with an Expandable Grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above method only ensures the safety of waypoints, and cannot guarantee the safety of trajectories generated according to waypoints. The method based on the risk index has been widely used on unmanned aerial vehicles [22], underwater vehicles [23], and ground mobile robots [24], but they still have some safety hazards.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above method only ensures the safety of waypoints, and cannot guarantee the safety of trajectories generated according to waypoints. The method based on the risk index has been widely used on unmanned aerial vehicles [22], underwater vehicles [23], and ground mobile robots [24], but they still have some safety hazards.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to realize the concept of hyper-modality robots [47], risk-aware path planning [48] is necessary to be considered. Autonomous path planning algorithms for ground-based robotic manoeuvres on planetary exploration are documented in [49,50] and for ground and aerial robots in [51].…”
Section: Autonomous Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupancy mapping, frontier generation, frontier selection, and occupancy-based path planning all rely on the ability to produce a consistent and, most importantly, a dense map of the environment, where a selected frontier point can be reached or seen without risking a crash, and where holes or unseen areas in the map don't promote unwanted or risky path planning behavior e.g. getting stuck, generating paths that go through holes or too close to the walls (a problem specifically analyzed in [34]), or excessively moving backand-forth in order to completely map the area due to hardto-see frontiers. In general, for rapid deployment and efficient exploration, the proposed desired navigation behavior in these tunnels is to move in the center of the tunnel, at a good distance from the ground and ceiling, while following the tunnel direction and avoiding any encountered obstacles.…”
Section: The Subterranean Tunnel Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%