2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2014.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D&O insurance and IPO performance: What can we learn from insurers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Board structure and governance may affect both the demand for D&O insurance and D&O insurance prices, and previous empirical literature has found some support for these effects (O'Sullivan, ; Core, ; Boyer and Stern, ). Our empirical models consider board characteristics that affect the likelihood of board opportunizm in purchasing insurance.…”
Section: Estimating Dando Insurance Demandmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Board structure and governance may affect both the demand for D&O insurance and D&O insurance prices, and previous empirical literature has found some support for these effects (O'Sullivan, ; Core, ; Boyer and Stern, ). Our empirical models consider board characteristics that affect the likelihood of board opportunizm in purchasing insurance.…”
Section: Estimating Dando Insurance Demandmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This idea is consistent with corporate insurance theory, which recognizes that insurance can increase firm value through specialized service provision. This has come to be known as the insurer monitoring hypothesis ; in this view one valuable service of D&O insurers may be monitoring of the firm's directors and officers (Bhagat, Brickley, and Coles, ; Holderness, ; O'Sullivan, ; Baker and Griffith, , ; Boyer and Stern, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that this type of insurance induces managers to become less risk averse and accordingly accept riskier but also more value‐enhancing projects and is hence beneficial for the firm, in contrast to the hypothesis of Chalmers, Dann, and Harford () or Core (), who view this kind of liability insurance as a means to promote managerial opportunism. As opposed to the results of Chalmers, Dann, and Harford () mentioned above, Boyer and Stern () an show that insurers demand higher premiums before the IPO to firms that are risker after the IPO. They find that companies paying a high price for their D&O coverage tend to underperform in their first year because of the higher probability to have a lower stock return and a higher volatility post‐IPO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Among the more recent articles on D&O insurance are the contributions by Cao and Narayanamoorthy (), Lin, Officer, and Zou (), Boyer and Stern, (, ), Gupta and Prakash (), Hwang and Kim (), Boyer and Stern (), Boyer and Tennyson (Forthcoming), and Lin et al (2013). Cao and Narayanamoorthy's () results support the litigation risk hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact that litigation risk has on the demand of D&O insurance will be stronger. Boyer & Stern (2014) showed that the regional efficiency of different legal system may eventually influence the execution of the law.…”
Section: Litigation Risk Judicial Transparency and Dando Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%