1970
DOI: 10.1016/0375-6505(70)90027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D.C. resistivity surveys of the Broadlands geothermal region, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the electric field vectors produced by the three sources are not independent, the third measurement is used to provide a check on data consistency and quality. For most dc measurements, apparent resistivity is defined by comparing the measured electric field strength vector E with the theoretical current density vector J for a uniform half-space [Risk et al, 1970;Zohdy, 1978]. However, the most general form for expressing the relationship between these two vector fields is as an apparent resistivity tensor 1/ defined by E = l/J.…”
Section: Shallow Resistivity Structure Of the Tvzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the electric field vectors produced by the three sources are not independent, the third measurement is used to provide a check on data consistency and quality. For most dc measurements, apparent resistivity is defined by comparing the measured electric field strength vector E with the theoretical current density vector J for a uniform half-space [Risk et al, 1970;Zohdy, 1978]. However, the most general form for expressing the relationship between these two vector fields is as an apparent resistivity tensor 1/ defined by E = l/J.…”
Section: Shallow Resistivity Structure Of the Tvzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such a feature is not generally eommon in nature, it is relevant for mapping in geothermal regions, as the boundary of a geothermal field is often modelled as a vertical diseontinuity in resistivity (e.g., Risk et al 1970). Theoretieal expressions for the apparent resistivity for this situation are given by Van Nostrand & Cook (1966).…”
Section: Apparent Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portions of the data from this map have previously been published in studies ofsome of the geothermal areas that lie within the map sheet (Maedonald 1966;Risk et al 1970;Dawson et al 1981;Bennie 1983;Risk et al 1984). Eaeh of these have been studies of small areas, and data outside the specifie region of interest have been ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bipole-dipole survey, undertaken over a 3 week period in late 1991 , employed the multiple-source bipole-dipole technique in the format developed in New Zealand primarily for geothermal exploration in 1968 (RISK et al, 1970;BIBBY and RISK, 1973). The sources were sited in forested land on the Kaingaroa Plateau (site shown in Fig.…”
Section: Multiple-source Bipole-dipole Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was followed by several investigations made using deep penetration direct current bipole-dipole surveying, from which the modern multiple-source bipole-dipole surveying was developed. The only published accounts of these surveys (RISK et al, 1970;RISK, 1973, 1992;BIBBY et al, 1984;RISK, 1984) deal mostly with geothermal resource investigations, but the data also reflect information about deep structures. Several studies have also been made using natural field methods, including magnetotelluric studies (HURST, 1974;MIDHA, 1979;INGHAM, 1987INGHAM, , 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%