2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

d-Wise generation of prosolvable groups

Abstract: Let G be a (topological) group. For 2 <= d epsilon N, denote by mu(d)(G) the largest m for which there exists an m-tuple of elements of G such that any of its d entries generate G (topologically). We obtain a lower bound for mu(d)(G) in the case when G is a prosolvable group. Our result implies in particular that if G is d-generated then the difference mu(d)(G) - d tends to infinity when the smallest prime divisor of the order of G tends to infinity. One of the aim of the paper is to draw the attention to an i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Put F= End Hfalse(Vfalse). Proposition [, Proposition 2.1] Let H=h1,,ht and wi=false(v1,i,,vδ,ifalse)Vδ with 1it. The following are equivalent.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Put F= End Hfalse(Vfalse). Proposition [, Proposition 2.1] Let H=h1,,ht and wi=false(v1,i,,vδ,ifalse)Vδ with 1it. The following are equivalent.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, a 5 ) generates V 5 as an H-module and {z, (1,2,3,4,5), (1, 2, 3)(4, 5, 6, 7)} is a CIG-set of G. Thus G is a (non-soluble) CIG group. Note that in this case the trivial element e is contained in the CIG-set {e, (1,2,3,4,5), (1, 2, 3)(4, 5, 6, 7)} of H, and dim F C V (e) = 5, so that the condition of Theorem 5 is satisfied. 2 Theorem 5 gives a necessary condition on u in order to ensure that the semidirect product G = V u H is a CIG group given that the irreducible linear group H is CIG.…”
Section: Cig and Pcig Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generating graph Γ(G) of a finite group G is the graph defined on the elements of G in such a way that two distinct vertices are connected by an edge if and only if they generate G . It was defined by Liebeck and Shalev in [22], and has been further investigated by many authors: see for example [4–8, 10, 20, 25, 27, 28, 31] for some of the range of questions that have been considered. Many deep structural results about finite groups can be expressed in terms of the generating graph, but of course Γ(G) encodes significant information only when G is a 2‐generator group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%