DABSTERS: A Privacy Preserving e-Voting Protocol for Permissioned Blockchain

Chaieb, Marwa; Koscina, Mirko; Yousfi, Souheib; Lafourcade, Pascal; Robbana, Riadh

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32505-3_17

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cost evaluation is a testing approach in which writers assess the expenses associated with using their product. It is essential when the Blockchain platform is open to the public and employs a cryptocurrency such as Ethereum, where each action has a cost measured in gas [ 151 , 159 ] conducted three types of tests, while only [ 131 , 183 ] ran four types.…”

Section: Results Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Scalable Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Systems

Jafar

Aziz

Shukur

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic voting systems must find solutions to various issues with authentication, data privacy and integrity, transparency, and verifiability. On the other hand, Blockchain technology offers an innovative solution to many of these problems. The scalability of Blockchain has arisen as a fundamental barrier to realizing the promise of this technology, especially in electronic voting. This study seeks to highlight the solutions regarding scalable Blockchain-based electronic voting systems and the issues linked with them while also attempting to foresee future developments. A systematic literature review (SLR) was used to complete the task, leading to the selection of 76 articles in the English language from 01.01.2017 to 31.03.2022 from the famous databases. This SLR was conducted to identify well-known proposals, their implementations, verification methods, various cryptographic solutions in previous research to evaluate cost and time. It also identifies performance parameters, the primary advantages and obstacles presented by different systems, and the most common approaches for Blockchain scalability. In addition, it outlines several possible research avenues for developing a scalable electronic voting system based on Blockchain technology. This research helps future research before proposing or developing any solutions to keep in mind all the voting requirements, merits, and demerits of the proposed solutions and provides further guidelines for scalable voting solutions.

show abstract

Section: Results Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Scalable Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Systems

Jafar

Aziz

Shukur

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Application is resistant Application is not resistant DDOS [21], [26], [26], [27], [34], [35], [63], [64] [44], [72] [22], [28], [33], [53], [84] [25], [50], [58], [77] Sybil Attack [21], [25], [27], [63] [28] Man of the Middle [44], [53] -Byzantine Fault [20], [25], [27], [31]- [33], [63], [75] [22] Coercion [21], [26], [31] [39], [74], [80], [85] [20], [26]- [28], [33], [53] [33], [40], [41], [45], [50], [60], [78], [86] Brute-Force Attack [23], [87] -DDoS attack because it is almost impossible for the adversary to compromise all the servers. If a DDoS attack occurs, the system will continue to ...…”

Section: Attack/threatmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such a system ensures that the coercer cannot be convinced of how a voter is voting, even if the voter cooperates with the coercer. As illustrated in Table 3, apart from a few exceptions [21], [26], [31] [39], [74], [80], [85], several applications are susceptible to this type of attack [20], [26]- [28], [33], [53] [33], [40], [41], [45], [50], [60], [78], [86] because it is impossible to prevent a user from voting in front of someone else or selling his key. This is a major flaw of e-voting that is unfortunately almost impossible to overcome today.…”

Section: Attack/threatmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[63]- [66], [66], [68], [75], [76], [84], [90]-[92] Fairness [21], [26], [26], [27], [29], [31]- [33], [53], [65], [68], [75], [87] [40], [44], [50], [52], [70], [78]- [80], [95] Eligibility [19], [21], [22], [24]- [26], [26], [27], [29], [31]- [35], [53], [63], [65], [66], [68], [75], [76], [84], [87], [91], [92] [20], [39], [40], [42], [48], [50],…”

Section: Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Blockchain Solutions for E-Voting: A Systematic Literature Review

Benabdallah¹,

Audras²,

Coudert³

et al. 2022

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today, the abstention rate continues to rise, largely due to the need to travel to vote. This is why remote evoting will increase the turnout by allowing everyone to vote without the need to travel. It will also minimize the risks and obtain results in a faster way compablack to a traditional vote with paper ballots. In fact, given the high stakes of an election, a remote e-voting solution must meet the highest standards of security, reliability, and transparency to gain the trust of citizens. In literature, several remote e-voting solutions based on blockchain technology have been proposed. Indeed, the blockchain technology is proposed today as a new technical infrastructure for several types of IT applications because it allows to remove the TTP and decentralize transactions while offering a transparent and fully protected data storage. In addition, it allows to implement in its environment the smart-contracts technology which is used to automate and execute agreements between users. In this paper, we are interested in reviewing the most revealing e-voting solutions based on blockchain technology.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, confidentiality of the individual vote is a fundamental component of a voting system however default settings within blockchain do not fulfil this requirement. Consequently, recent efforts such as [41] have focused at achieving privacy-aware voting overlaying blockchain technology to fulfil this requirement. With respect to double utilization in e-voting, existing approaches rely on the assumptions that majority of computing resources are controlled by honest miners.…”

Section: Blockchain-based E-votingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical analysis of transaction malleability within blockchain-based e-Voting

Khan

Arshad

Khan

2021

Computers & Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blockchain is a disruptive technology that has been used to address a wide range of challenges in diverse domains including voting, logistics, healthcare and finance. Transaction malleability is one of the critical threats for blockchain, which can facilitate double-spending attacks by tampering with the state of a blockchain. This paper investigates the potential of transaction malleability attack within a blockchain-based application (e-voting) with the aim to identify settings which can lead to a successful transaction malleability attack. Therein, we aim to highlight conditions which can cause transaction malleability attack so as to help develop appropriate protection mechanisms. In particular, a successful execution of transaction malleability attack is presented which was conducted on a blockchain testbed hosting an e-voting application. The experiments identified significance of parameters such as network delay and block generation rate to successfully execute transaction malleability attack and have highlighted directions for future research.

show abstract

DABSTERS: A Privacy Preserving e-Voting Protocol for Permissioned Blockchain

Cited by 12 publications

References 17 publications

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Scalable Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Systems

A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Scalable Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Systems

Analysis of Blockchain Solutions for E-Voting: A Systematic Literature Review

Empirical analysis of transaction malleability within blockchain-based e-Voting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About