2013
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbt035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Emotional and Physical Reactivity to Stressors Among Widowed and Married Older Adults

Abstract: Objectives. Widowhood may result in declines in health and potentially stressful changes to daily routines. However, little research has examined how daily stressors contribute to physical and emotional well-being in widowhood. The objectives of the current study were to examine daily stressor exposure and reactivity in widowed versus married older adults. Method.Participants included all 100 widowed and 342 married adults aged 65 and older from the National Study of Daily Experiences, a daily diary study from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
32
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential explanation for these findings is that widowed and married adults have been found to have similar exposure and emotional reactivity to stressors when excluding spousal arguments. 19 Across all three racial and ethnic groups, the prevalence of cigarette smoking among those who were widowed were lower than those who were divorced or separated. Yet, prior research often combined widowed with divorced and separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation for these findings is that widowed and married adults have been found to have similar exposure and emotional reactivity to stressors when excluding spousal arguments. 19 Across all three racial and ethnic groups, the prevalence of cigarette smoking among those who were widowed were lower than those who were divorced or separated. Yet, prior research often combined widowed with divorced and separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, finding a relationship with a domain-general measure of control beliefs may be that much more “compelling” as compared to domain-specific control beliefs. We controlled for time in our analyses as previous work has done (Hahn et al, 2014) because over the 12 weeks of diaries there was a significant decline in self-reported memory problems. While short-term repeated measurement in diary studies may reduce recall bias (Bolger et al, 2003), the potential participant burden may result in a drop-off in reports over twelve weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariates (age, gender, education, functional health, trait sense of control, and initial working memory) are not shown in Equation 1 but were included in the model. Level 1: MEMORY PROBLEMS ij = β 0 j + β 1 j (WEEKLY CONTROL ij ) + e ij Level 2: β 0 j = γ 00 + γ 01 (SOC) + γ 02 (MEMORY DECLINE)+ γ 03 (SOC*MEMORY DECLINE) u 0 j β1j=γ10+γ11false(normalSnormalOnormalCfalse)+γ12false(normalSnormalOnormalC*MEMORY DECLINEfalse)+u1j Because there was a significant drop-off in the reports of memory problems over the course of the 12 weeks of data collection, time was included as a covariate in the analysis as previous work has done (Hahn, Cichy, Small, & Almeida, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time (day 1, day 2, etc.) was also included as a covariate to account for the drop off in reports of memory problems that often occurs in diary data collection (Bolger et al, 2003; Hahn, Cichy, Small, & Almeida, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%