Daily Fluctuations in the Isotope and Elemental Composition of Tap Water in Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

The isotope and elemental composition of tap water reflects its multiple distinct inputs and provides a link between infrastructure and the environment over a range of scales. For example, on a local scale, they can be helpful in understanding the geological, hydrogeological, and hydrological conditions and monitor the proper functioning of the water supply system (WSS). However, despite this, studies examining the urban water system remain limited. This study sought to address this knowledge gap by performing a 24 h multiparameter analysis of tap water extracted from a region where the mixing of groundwater between two recharge areas occurs. This work included measurements of temperature and electrical conductivity, as well as pH, δ2H, δ18O, d, δ13CDIC, and 87Sr/86Sr ratios and major and trace elements at hourly intervals over a 24 h period. Although the data show only slight variations in the measured parameters, four groups were distinguishable using visual grouping, and multivariate analysis (Spearman correlation coefficient analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and principal components analysis). Finally, changes in the mixing ratios of the two sources were estimated using a linear mixing model. The results confirm that the relative contribution from each source varied considerably over 24 h.

SLONIP—A Slovenian Web-Based Interactive Research Platform on Water Isotopes in Precipitation

“…The results are normalized to VSMOW/SLAP using LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System for Light Stable Isotopes) program. For details see [27,[61][62][63][64]. The overall uncertainties are estimated to be less than 1 ‰, 0.05 ‰ and 1.01 ‰ for δ 2 H, δ 18 O and deuterium excess, respectively.…”

“…The analytical details are described in [37,[40][41][42][43][44]46,54]. In 2016 the infrastructure of the JSI laboratories was improved, and since then, the isotopic composition of hydrogen (δ 2 H) and oxygen (δ 18 [27,[61][62][63][64]. The overall uncertainties are estimated to be less than 1 ‰, 0.05 ‰ and 1.01 ‰ for δ 2 H, δ 18 O and deuterium excess, respectively.…”