2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-013-0382-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Forecasting of Dam Water Levels: Comparing a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Model With Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sivapragasam et al (2001) used SVR for forecasting rainfall and runoff. The SVR was successfully employed to forecast flood stage by Liong and Sivapragasam (2002), to develop rating curves at three gauging stations in Washington by Sivapragasam and Muttil (2005), to predict water level fluctuations of Lake Erie by Khan and Coulibaly (2006), to forecast long-term discharges by Lin et al (2006), to predict daily sediments in natural rivers by Cimen (2008), to model daily potential evapotranspiration by Kisi and Cimen (2009), to downscale the daily precipitations by Chen et al (2010), to predict daily streamflows with weather and climate inputs by Rasouli et al (2012), to forecast daily dam water levels by Hipni et al (2013), to improve forecast of annual rainfallrunoffs by Wang et al (2013), and to forecast daily river flows in the semiarid mountain region by He et al (2014). The major disadvantage of the SVR method is its higher computational burden for the constrained optimization problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sivapragasam et al (2001) used SVR for forecasting rainfall and runoff. The SVR was successfully employed to forecast flood stage by Liong and Sivapragasam (2002), to develop rating curves at three gauging stations in Washington by Sivapragasam and Muttil (2005), to predict water level fluctuations of Lake Erie by Khan and Coulibaly (2006), to forecast long-term discharges by Lin et al (2006), to predict daily sediments in natural rivers by Cimen (2008), to model daily potential evapotranspiration by Kisi and Cimen (2009), to downscale the daily precipitations by Chen et al (2010), to predict daily streamflows with weather and climate inputs by Rasouli et al (2012), to forecast daily dam water levels by Hipni et al (2013), to improve forecast of annual rainfallrunoffs by Wang et al (2013), and to forecast daily river flows in the semiarid mountain region by He et al (2014). The major disadvantage of the SVR method is its higher computational burden for the constrained optimization problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V-fold cross-validation was selected to obtain an almost unbiased estimate of the algorithm performance but with a high variance because, in principle, it can be conducted for as long as one can afford to do so (indicating that it is a trial-and-error method to achieve optimal performances). The models exhibiting outstanding performances were observed when the V-fold was between 7 and 20 [45][46][47].…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hipni et al [17] point out that ANFIS has been widely used in the predictive modelling of problems related to hydrology, emphasising its ease of implementation, rapid and successful learning and a great generalization capacity, such as some of its causes popularity. Jain et al [18] use the neuronal networks to predict the input flow into the reservoir and Ondimu and Murase [19], for predictions of water level in reservoirs.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%