“…Also, it is known that ET
opening efficiency has both a constitutive and a situational component and that
constitutive efficiency is downgraded temporarily during conditional situations such
as an extant viral upper respiratory infection (Doyle et al, 2014). Simulations 5 and 6 predict that a downgraded ET
opening efficiency will be expressed as a less efficient MEPR for those periods
which is accompanied by a consequent negative shift in the EV-MEEPG, effects
validated by the change in MEEPG (tympanometric pressure) observed for children and
adults during natural and experimental upper respiratory viral infections (Antonio et al, 2002; Buchman et al, 1995; Moody et al, 1998). In addition, emergent features of the model such as
physiologic ME species-pressures (Simulation 6), the negative EV-MEEPG for all ET
opening efficiencies not equal to 1 (Simulation 3), and the perfusion-limitation on
the rate of MEEPG change (Simulations 2, 3) are consistent with clinical measurement
(Antonio et al, 2002; Felding et al, 1987; Hergils et al, 1990; Hergils et al,
1997; Moody et al, 1998; Sade et al, 1993) and experimental results
(Buchman et al, 1995; Teixeira et al, 2015; Teixeira et al, 2016).…”