2011
DOI: 10.1002/eej.21014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily integrated generation scheduling for thermal, pumped‐storage, and cascaded hydro units and purchasing power considering network constraints

Abstract: SUMMARYWe have developed an innovative power generation scheduling method using quadratic programming (QP). The advantage of using our method is that it simultaneously solves unit commitment and economic load dispatch. We relax the binary variables of the unit state into continuous variables to apply QP to this problem. We also add a penalty term to converge the value of those variables to 0 or 1 to the objective function: the sum of the fuel costs and the start-up costs. This penalty term depends on the per-u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These constraints with the valve-point loading impact make this problem a non-linear and complicated optimization problem. Several analytical optimization methods have been employed such as dynamic programming (DP) [1], mixed-integer linear programming [2], nonlinear programming (NLP) [3], and Lagrange relaxation (LR) [4]. It should be highlighted here that these methods suffer from stagnation, and they are not able to provide the optimal solution due to the nonlinearity and composite constraints of the STHS problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constraints with the valve-point loading impact make this problem a non-linear and complicated optimization problem. Several analytical optimization methods have been employed such as dynamic programming (DP) [1], mixed-integer linear programming [2], nonlinear programming (NLP) [3], and Lagrange relaxation (LR) [4]. It should be highlighted here that these methods suffer from stagnation, and they are not able to provide the optimal solution due to the nonlinearity and composite constraints of the STHS problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%