2018
DOI: 10.1111/aas.13211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily intra‐abdominal pressure, Sequential Organ Failure Score and fluid balance predict duration of mechanical ventilation

Abstract: IAPs did not correlate with pulmonary compliance in critically ill patients. Increased IAP was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. A nomogram integrating daily IAP, SOFA score and fluid balance may be used to predict the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hudorovic and Vicic-Hudorovic [19] found no significant difference in relation to the IAP values and disease severity scores. Nevertheless, Iyer et al [20] suggested that a nomogram integrating daily IAP, SOFA score, and fluid balance might be used to predict the duration of mechanical ventilation. The SOFA scores were not one of the endpoints of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hudorovic and Vicic-Hudorovic [19] found no significant difference in relation to the IAP values and disease severity scores. Nevertheless, Iyer et al [20] suggested that a nomogram integrating daily IAP, SOFA score, and fluid balance might be used to predict the duration of mechanical ventilation. The SOFA scores were not one of the endpoints of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with ΔIAP ≥ 38mmHg, only 3 (5.1%) failed extubation, and none of the patients with ΔIAP greater than 50mmHg failed extubation. Studies [32][33][34] have shown that the abdominal muscles are an P r e p r i n t important component of the respiratory muscles. The strength of the respiratory muscles affects the outcome of extubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion criteria were as follows: age ≤28 days (n = 82) or >14 years (n = 21), PICU admission for <24 h (n = 47), lack of parental consent (n = 6), use of chemical neuromuscular blockade (n = 15), and history of neurogenic bladder (n = 9) or bladder surgery (n = 28). Finally, 229 critically ill children were enrolled in the study, and the mortality predictive value was determined in these patients; 111 of the 229 patients did not have high-risk factors (Supplementary Table 1) (with the exception of physiological parameters) or clinical manifestations of IAH (9), and the normal IAP values were determined in these patients. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of the two study centers (2013, No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, only few studies have examined the normal reference range of IAP in PICU patients (7,8). According to the updated World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines (9), the normal IAP value in a critically ill child was 4-10 mmHg; IAH was defined as a sustained IAP elevation of >10 mmHg; the guidelines are based on data collected from a single-center study of children who were put on mechanical ventilation (MV) (7). However, a recent study identified MV as a risk factor for IAH; additionally, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level of >10 cmH 2 O (1 cmH 2 O = 0.098 kPa) is considered a risk factor for IAH in children (10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%