1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00714998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily physical activity levels in preadolescent boys related to $$\dot V_{O_{2max} } $$ and lactate threshold

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the physical activity levels in eleven 9-10 year old boys with reference to aerobic power or lactate threshold (LT). Daily physical activity levels were evaluated from a HR monitoring system for 12 h on three different days. VO2max, VO2-HR relationship and LT were determined by the progressive treadmill test. LT was 36.7 +/- 3.1 ml X kg-1 X min-1 and 71.0 +/- 6.6% VO2max. Mean total time of activities with HR above the level corresponding to 60% VO2max (T-60%) and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
4

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The black shaded areas are those differences that were within the MID of ±8% peak _ VO 2 : The white bar represents the group mean systematic bias of -3.8% peak _ VO 2 above an initial baseline commonly used in adult-based studies and in our own work. The LIAB for the boys in our study is considerably lower than the 'lactate threshold' reported by Atomi et al (1986) for 11-year-old boys using the same criteria to define this parameter (71 vs. 39% peak _ VO 2 ). It should be noted that the absolute lactate concentration at the 'lactate threshold' was 1.60 mmol L -1 (Atomi et al 1986) which is also much higher than the baseline value of 0.98 mmol L -1 at which the LIAB was identified in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The black shaded areas are those differences that were within the MID of ±8% peak _ VO 2 : The white bar represents the group mean systematic bias of -3.8% peak _ VO 2 above an initial baseline commonly used in adult-based studies and in our own work. The LIAB for the boys in our study is considerably lower than the 'lactate threshold' reported by Atomi et al (1986) for 11-year-old boys using the same criteria to define this parameter (71 vs. 39% peak _ VO 2 ). It should be noted that the absolute lactate concentration at the 'lactate threshold' was 1.60 mmol L -1 (Atomi et al 1986) which is also much higher than the baseline value of 0.98 mmol L -1 at which the LIAB was identified in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The LIAB for the boys in our study is considerably lower than the 'lactate threshold' reported by Atomi et al (1986) for 11-year-old boys using the same criteria to define this parameter (71 vs. 39% peak _ VO 2 ). It should be noted that the absolute lactate concentration at the 'lactate threshold' was 1.60 mmol L -1 (Atomi et al 1986) which is also much higher than the baseline value of 0.98 mmol L -1 at which the LIAB was identified in our study. The % peak _ VO 2 at 1.60 mmol L -1 for the participants in our study would still have been lower than Atomi's, but the difference would have been very much smaller.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Only a few studies in children and adolescents have calibrated the subjects in relation to their individual VO 2 ± HR regression lines (Verschuur & Kemper, 1985;Atomi et al, 1986;Riddoch et al, 1991;Livingstone et al, 1992;Emons et al, 1992;Ekelund et al, 1999). Despite the fact that HR is affected by emotional status, temperature, day to day variation and type of work performed, validation studies using the DLW method in children and adolescents have shown that minby-min HR monitoring produced similar results for TDEE in groups of children and adolescents with various levels of physical activity (Livingstone et al, 1992;Maffeis et al, 1995;van den Berg-Emons et al, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not adirect measure of physical activity, heart rate (HR) monitoring is one of the most frequently used methods for assessing physical activity in children and adolescents (Atomi et al 1986;Armstrong et al 1990; Armstrong and Bray 1991;Riddoch et al 1991;Livingstone et al 1992;Janz et al 1994;Gilbey and Gilbey 1995;Gavarry et al 1998;Ekelund et al 1999Ekelund et al , 2000. To quantify the amount and patterns of physical activity in children and adolescents, dierent approaches have been used to identify the HR corresponding to dierent intensities of physical activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%