“…Human‐induced land use changes may eliminate natural roosting and nesting habitats for wildlife, particularly for species that typically roost in cavities and crevices in mature trees. Practitioners often supply “nest” boxes as alternative roosts (e.g., Arias, Gignoux‐Wofsohn, Kerwin, & Maslo, 2020; Collins, Ross, Ferguson, Williams, & Langton, 2020; Lindenmayer et al, 2017; Rueegger, Goldingay, Law, & Gonsalves, 2019); such roosts are commonly deployed for bats (Flaquer, Torre, & Ruiz‐Jarillo, 2006; Mering & Chambers, 2012; Mering & Chambers, 2014), birds (De León & Mínguez, 2003; Demeyrier, Lambrechts, Perret, & Grégoire, 2016; Stephens, Kaminski, Leopold, & Gerard, 1998), rodents (Iwińska, Boratyński, Trivedi, & Borowski, 2020), and marsupials (Beyer & Goldingay, 2006; Isaac, Parsons, & Goodman, 2008; Rueegger, Goldingay, & Brookes, 2012). While intended to enhance the recovery and persistence of at‐risk species, on some occasions these artificial structures have adverse negative effects, leading to low survival and fecundity (e.g., Klein, Nagy, Csörgo, & Mátics, 2007; Miller, 2002; Semel, Sherman, & Byers, 1988).…”