2020
DOI: 10.29328/journal.ivs.1001020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dairy cattle producers’ perception on Oestrus Synchronization and mass artificial insemination services in Waliso and Ilu Districts of South West Shoa Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calving rate (CR) was defined as the number of calves born per 100 services and is the most appropriate measure of fertility (Mohamed, 2004). The present result on CR (20.5 %) is much below the findings of Alemshet et al (2017) in HF and Zebu crossbred cows (54.8 ± 1.35 %) in Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, Emebet and Zeleke (2014) and Haileyesus (2006) reported in crossbred dairy cows (63.4 to 76.9 %) in different parts of the country, 26.22 % in South West Shoa Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia through FTAI (Fekata et al, 2020), 39 % in smallholder dairy herd bred by conventional AI in Kenya (Kinyua, 2016), and 37 % in dairy cows of Eastern and Southeastern Zones of Tigray, Ethiopia (Ashebir et al, 2016). (Khan et al, 2013;Schuller et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calving rate (CR) was defined as the number of calves born per 100 services and is the most appropriate measure of fertility (Mohamed, 2004). The present result on CR (20.5 %) is much below the findings of Alemshet et al (2017) in HF and Zebu crossbred cows (54.8 ± 1.35 %) in Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, Emebet and Zeleke (2014) and Haileyesus (2006) reported in crossbred dairy cows (63.4 to 76.9 %) in different parts of the country, 26.22 % in South West Shoa Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia through FTAI (Fekata et al, 2020), 39 % in smallholder dairy herd bred by conventional AI in Kenya (Kinyua, 2016), and 37 % in dairy cows of Eastern and Southeastern Zones of Tigray, Ethiopia (Ashebir et al, 2016). (Khan et al, 2013;Schuller et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Cattle AI service programme was not significantly (P > 0.05) important in the Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia because 47.3 % of the small-scale farmers were not satisfied by the cattle AI service programme. However, the present report is not similar with the reports of Kindalem (2019) reported that 94.0 % of AI beneficiaries in Janamora district were not satisfied by the AI service; Gebremedhin (2008) reported the respondents in Tiyo (31 %) and Sagure (45.5 %) districts of Arsi Zone were satisfied with AI service; 55.8 % of the respondents were not satisfied by AI service (Riyad et al, 2017); Desalegn (2008) reported that 93.1 % of the AI beneficiary farmers did not get reliable and consistent AI service and were not satisfied; 69.17 % of the respondents in West Gojjam Zone were not satisfied in AI service (Malede et al, 2013); 69.9 % respondents in Debretabour Town, Ethiopia were not satisfied by AI service (Bemrew et al, 2015); Getabalew et al (2019) reported that there is little or no satisfaction on AI service delivery system by most smallholder dairy farmers in many places of Ethiopia, and 67.15 % of the respondents in South West Shoa Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia were not satisfied on oestrus synchronization and mass AI service (Fekata et al, 2020). The differences in AI service satisfaction level in different parts of the country could be due to lack of awareness, efficiency of AITs, oestrus detection, ecology, husbandry practices, semen quality and semen handling procedures and overall efficiency of AI service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%