2021
DOI: 10.2172/1829573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.15 User's Manual

Abstract: The DAKOTA (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications) toolkit provides a flexible and extensible interface between simulation codes and iterative analysis methods. DAKOTA contains algorithms for optimization with gradient and nongradient-based methods; uncertainty quantification with sampling, reliability, and stochastic finite element methods; parameter estimation with nonlinear least squares methods; and sensitivity/variance analysis with design of experiments and parameter study metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful implementation of this coupled model approach will allow for the constraint of the long-term geomorphic evolution of rocky coasts over a wide range of coastal cliff environments (and degree of shore platform preservation therein) in a manner that reduces equifinality that often arises from coastal evolution models due to (necessarily) simplified erosional processes (Shadrick et al, 2021). Best fit solutions are achieved via Metropolis Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC, Adams et al, 2019;Estacio-Hiroms et al, 2016) simulations that iterate over a wide range of possible input values for the parameters most likely to influence shore platform evolution: material resistance, wave height decay rate, and intertidal weathering rate (Carr & Graff, 1982;Matsumoto et al, 2018), Through a simultaneous optimization of measured 10 Be concentrations and shore platform topography to modeled predictions of both, we estimate late Holocene (∼2 kyr) coastal cliff retreat rates for Del Mar, California and explore the influence of relative sea level rise, waves, and weathering on long-term coastal erosion at this site.…”
Section: Estimating Long-term Retreat Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful implementation of this coupled model approach will allow for the constraint of the long-term geomorphic evolution of rocky coasts over a wide range of coastal cliff environments (and degree of shore platform preservation therein) in a manner that reduces equifinality that often arises from coastal evolution models due to (necessarily) simplified erosional processes (Shadrick et al, 2021). Best fit solutions are achieved via Metropolis Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC, Adams et al, 2019;Estacio-Hiroms et al, 2016) simulations that iterate over a wide range of possible input values for the parameters most likely to influence shore platform evolution: material resistance, wave height decay rate, and intertidal weathering rate (Carr & Graff, 1982;Matsumoto et al, 2018), Through a simultaneous optimization of measured 10 Be concentrations and shore platform topography to modeled predictions of both, we estimate late Holocene (∼2 kyr) coastal cliff retreat rates for Del Mar, California and explore the influence of relative sea level rise, waves, and weathering on long-term coastal erosion at this site.…”
Section: Estimating Long-term Retreat Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to Ref. [82] for more details of the optimization algorithm. The calibrated parameters are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of the transversely isotropic formulations are further demonstrated by the displacement results of the samples, as shown in Figures 12 and 13, where simulation results with and without transverse isotropy are shown side by side. To introduce a control experiment, the material parameters of the simulations conducted via the isotropic model have been optimized with the Dakota package, 82 following the same procedure of the anisotropic scenario to minimize the least square errors for the same set of objective functions listed above.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference Webpage Dakota C++ [1] https://dakota.sandia.gov PyApprox Python https://pypi.org/project/pyapprox MUQ C++, Python [29] https://mituq.bitbucket.io UQLab Matlab [22] https://uqlab.com ChaosPy Python [12,11] https://chaospy.readthedocs.io SG++ Python, MATLAB, Java, C++ [30] https://sgpp.sparsegrids.org/ Spinterp Matlab [19,20] http://calgo.acm.org/847.zip 1 UQTk C++, Python [8,7] https://sandia.gov/uqtoolkit Tasmanian C++, Python, MATLAB, Fortran 90/95 [36,38,37] https://tasmanian.ornl.gov Table 1: Comparison of high-dimensional approximation / UQ-related software. how sparse grids are generated in the Sparse Grids Matlab Kit, how they are stored in memory (data structure) and what options are available for their generation.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%